PV cell activation selectively affects different decision-making components.
<p><b>A)</b> Response latency for time to first lick in laser off (0 mW/mm<sup>2</sup>) vs. laser on (0.04–0.43 mW/mm<sup>2</sup>) in the early window condition (easy discrimination) for ‘go’ (left panel) and ‘no-go’ (right panel) stimuli. Circle, median; li...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels does not improve performance of difficult visual discriminations.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
Reliable expression of ChR2-EYFP and ChrimsonR-tdTomato in PV cells.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
(related to Fig 5) Effects of PV cell activation on the activity of Pyr cells across the different time windows and task difficulty conditions.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025)