Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).

<p>Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).</p>

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Su Chul Han (2009233) (author)
Other Authors: Min Cheol Han (9727813) (author), Jihun Kim (10091) (author), Heerim Nam (22057316) (author), Jin Sung Kim (679262) (author), Kwangwoo Park (9727819) (author)
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1852017591167483904
author Su Chul Han (2009233)
author2 Min Cheol Han (9727813)
Jihun Kim (10091)
Heerim Nam (22057316)
Jin Sung Kim (679262)
Kwangwoo Park (9727819)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Su Chul Han (2009233)
Min Cheol Han (9727813)
Jihun Kim (10091)
Heerim Nam (22057316)
Jin Sung Kim (679262)
Kwangwoo Park (9727819)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Su Chul Han (2009233)
Min Cheol Han (9727813)
Jihun Kim (10091)
Heerim Nam (22057316)
Jin Sung Kim (679262)
Kwangwoo Park (9727819)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-08-14T21:06:17Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0324722.t001
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_beam_quality_of_applicators_depending_on_field_size_and_SSD_95_100_and_105_cm_/29914889
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biophysics
Microbiology
Cell Biology
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology
Biotechnology
Cancer
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Physical Sciences not elsewhere classified
size electron cone
consistently higher across
5 &# 8201
depth dose comparisons
based general applicator
indirect tps calculations
commercial tps combined
measured field sizes
including beam profiles
dose distributions obtained
calculating monitor units
relative output factors
output factors
monitor units
field sizes
dose distributions
beam profiles
general applicators
dose calculation
relative ofs
xlink ">
water phantom
study aims
results demonstrate
reliable method
performed using
passing rate
natively supported
diamond detector
cerrobend cutout
approach offers
0 %.
0 %,
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Dataset
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dataset
description <p>Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).</p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara_9ceedd46de65ba3fbc476daa5e9e4e8c
identifier_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0324722.t001
network_acronym_str Manara
network_name_str ManaraRepo
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/29914889
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).Su Chul Han (2009233)Min Cheol Han (9727813)Jihun Kim (10091)Heerim Nam (22057316)Jin Sung Kim (679262)Kwangwoo Park (9727819)BiophysicsMicrobiologyCell BiologyMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiotechnologyCancerInfectious DiseasesVirologyPhysical Sciences not elsewhere classifiedsize electron coneconsistently higher across5 &# 8201depth dose comparisonsbased general applicatorindirect tps calculationscommercial tps combinedmeasured field sizesincluding beam profilesdose distributions obtainedcalculating monitor unitsrelative output factorsoutput factorsmonitor unitsfield sizesdose distributionsbeam profilesgeneral applicatorsdose calculationrelative ofsxlink ">water phantomstudy aimsresults demonstratereliable methodperformed usingpassing ratenatively supporteddiamond detectorcerrobend cutoutapproach offers0 %.0 %,<p>Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).</p>2025-08-14T21:06:17ZDatasetinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiondataset10.1371/journal.pone.0324722.t001https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_beam_quality_of_applicators_depending_on_field_size_and_SSD_95_100_and_105_cm_/29914889CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/299148892025-08-14T21:06:17Z
spellingShingle Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
Su Chul Han (2009233)
Biophysics
Microbiology
Cell Biology
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology
Biotechnology
Cancer
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Physical Sciences not elsewhere classified
size electron cone
consistently higher across
5 &# 8201
depth dose comparisons
based general applicator
indirect tps calculations
commercial tps combined
measured field sizes
including beam profiles
dose distributions obtained
calculating monitor units
relative output factors
output factors
monitor units
field sizes
dose distributions
beam profiles
general applicators
dose calculation
relative ofs
xlink ">
water phantom
study aims
results demonstrate
reliable method
performed using
passing rate
natively supported
diamond detector
cerrobend cutout
approach offers
0 %.
0 %,
status_str publishedVersion
title Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
title_full Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
title_fullStr Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
title_short Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
title_sort Comparison of beam quality of applicators depending on field size and SSD (95, 100, and 105 cm).
topic Biophysics
Microbiology
Cell Biology
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology
Biotechnology
Cancer
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Physical Sciences not elsewhere classified
size electron cone
consistently higher across
5 &# 8201
depth dose comparisons
based general applicator
indirect tps calculations
commercial tps combined
measured field sizes
including beam profiles
dose distributions obtained
calculating monitor units
relative output factors
output factors
monitor units
field sizes
dose distributions
beam profiles
general applicators
dose calculation
relative ofs
xlink ">
water phantom
study aims
results demonstrate
reliable method
performed using
passing rate
natively supported
diamond detector
cerrobend cutout
approach offers
0 %.
0 %,