(related to Fig 5) Effects of PV cell activation on the activity of Pyr cells across the different time windows and task difficulty conditions.
<p><b>A)</b> Histogram of stimulus selectivity (positive values: cells prefer rewarded go stimulus; negative values: cells prefer unrewarded no-go stimulus) for pre- and post-learning of the visual discrimination task. Pre: <i>n</i> = 1,147, 10 mice, 0.05 ± 0.02; Post:...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
(related to Fig 4) Effects of PV cell activation on the lick latency of go and no-go stimuli across the different time windows in the easy discrimination task.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
PV cell activation selectively affects different decision-making components.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels during entire stimulus presentation or late phase V1 activity impairs discrimination performance, whereas stimulating during early phase V1 activity improves performance.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025)