Framework for the acceptability of technological health innovations [25].

Framework for the acceptability of technological health innovations [25].

<p>Framework for the acceptability of technological health innovations [<a href="/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005119#pgph.0005119.ref025" target="_blank">25</a>].</p>

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal:	Wezzie S. Lora (18139765) (author)
Autres auteurs:	Yasmin Dunkley (20323888) (author), Itai Kabonga (20910260) (author), Elvis Isere (11349284) (author), MackWellings Phiri (22676615) (author), Chimwemwe Kwanjo Banda (22676618) (author), Euphemia Sibanda (4515067) (author), John Bimba (17445769) (author), Richard Chilongosi (7402244) (author), Karin Hatzold (291444) (author), Frances M. Cowan (10023557) (author), Elizabeth L. Corbett (8150859) (author), Augustine T. Choko (9951311) (author), Nicola Desmond (32737) (author)
Publié:	2025
Sujets:	Medicine Sociology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified virus &# 8217 sample collection compared rapid response capabilities prolonged turnaround times participants particularly valued mitigate severe outcomes louart &# 8217 face implementation challenges different use cases technological healthcare innovations existing healthcare systems three settings due acceptable complementary methodology xlink "> accessible timely diagnostic testing longer perceived testing accessible diagnostic technologies qualitative study drawing healthcare workers constrained settings acceptable across testing option pcr testing 19 testing rdt testing theoretical framework study revealed strategic investment somewhat affected reduced stigma participant groups minimal disruption many individuals findings emphasise depth interviews delivery models cost alternatives community members administered either 19 pandemic
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_lpc1p65rem52k15ffuirpp956h