(a), (b), and (c) shows the variations in pH of well water samples treated with different concentrations in powder, soaked, and boiled forms at a 12-hour contact time.

(a), (b), and (c) shows the variations in pH of well water samples treated with different concentrations in powder, soaked, and boiled forms at a 12-hour contact time.

<p>(a), (b), and (c) shows the variations in pH of well water samples treated with different concentrations in powder, soaked, and boiled forms at a 12-hour contact time.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Josephat Ilunde (22184433) (author)
Other Authors:	Nelson Mpumi (22184436) (author), Mwema Felix Mwema (22184439) (author), Revocatus L. Machunda (22184442) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Biochemistry Biotechnology Ecology Sociology Infectious Diseases Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified turbidity levels remained total dissolved solids sleepy morning plant significantly affected across pathogen killing agent key physicochemical parameters determine bacterial removal waltheria indica </ total coliforms </ 8 %, respectively escherichia coli </ plant root extracts div >< p treated water ’ contaminated water samples coli </ treated using 8 %) water disinfection varying concentrations three forms strong potential shallow wells results suggest results showed research aims related diseases powdered form potential alternative phytochemical profiling misungwi district many parts litre beakers laboratory experiments evaluated using contact times boiled extracts boiled extract approximately 94 affordable method acceptable limit >, achieving 5 ntu 2 %).
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!