(related to Fig 2) Changes in behavioral readouts as a function of laser power in the easy discrimination task.
<p><b>A)</b> Average discrimination performance, <i>d’</i>, <b>B)</b> hit rate, and <b>C)</b> false alarm rate for all time window conditions. <b>D)</b> Normalized average discrimination performance, <i>d’</i>, in the ‘ent...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Beste egile batzuk: | , , , |
| Argitaratua: |
2025
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
| Gaia: | <p><b>A)</b> Average discrimination performance, <i>d’</i>, <b>B)</b> hit rate, and <b>C)</b> false alarm rate for all time window conditions. <b>D)</b> Normalized average discrimination performance, <i>d’</i>, in the ‘entire’ window for sessions with lower hit rate (> 0.95). Shading, 95% CI of bootstrap distribution. Data is normalized by subtracting the value of the 0 power level during 0–2 s of stimulus onset. The same normalization method is applied across all normalized data plots regardless of the stimulation window duration. <b>E)</b> Normalized false alarm rate in the ‘entire’ window. Color lines, individual mice (<i>N</i> = 10, 41 sessions). <b>F)</b> Normalized discrimination performance, <i>d’</i>, in the ‘early’ window. Color lines, individual mice (<i>N</i> = 10, 37 sessions). <b>G)</b> Average discrimination performance, <i>d’</i>, in three mice, where high laser power (2 mW/mm<sup>2</sup>) was used to silence the ‘early’ window (6 sessions). As expected, two of three mice showed impaired performance. <b>H)</b> Average running speed for ‘go’ (continuous) and ‘no-go’ (interrupted) conditions for the mouse which retained high performance when the ‘early’ window was silenced at 2 mW/mm<sup>2</sup>. Running was delayed relative to stimulus presentation. In all plots, except D), error bars or shading indicate SEM.</p> <p>(TIFF)</p> |
|---|