Proportion of indoor contact hours attributable to each congregate setting outside the household.

Proportion of indoor contact hours attributable to each congregate setting outside the household.

<p>Proportion of indoor contact hours attributable to each congregate setting outside the household.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Kate E. LeGrand (9902043) (author)
Other Authors:	Anita Edwards (11410619) (author), Mbali Mohlamonyane (16827914) (author), Njabulo Dayi (11410625) (author), Stephen Olivier (11410622) (author), Dickman Gareta (337425) (author), Robin Wood (4924) (author), Alison D. Grant (8120459) (author), Richard G. White (92065) (author), Keren Middelkoop (153670) (author), Palwasha Khan (771358) (author), Nicky McCreesh (478547) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Neuroscience Biotechnology Sociology Cancer Science Policy Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified peoples ’ homes locations may enhance comparable population sizes cluster randomised trials adults aged 18 mycobacterium tuberculosis </ 7 %), compared provide valuable insights social contact survey social contact relevant similar among rural tuberculosis infection transmission participants ’ communities prioritising ipc measures household contact tracing potential transmission patterns social contact data considering contact patterns urban participants spent 5 %) participants rural ), 55 explore three contexts care </ p 9 %), peri 0 %) compared congregate settings outside urban participants reported participants reported household contact contact data three communities rural participants variable social contact patterns urban participants three contexts urban ), mtb </ >) transmission 4 %), provide information office settings ipc ); control measures contact outside 5 %). local contexts urban township 8 %) visit durations
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Be the first to leave a comment!

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_uf4d8juhob77g5ia45uotakhjc