Comparing HOSS with flat method.
<p>Optimizations were carried out using 200 start points for each method, launched on 16 processes on a 128-core server. Solution times were computed individually for each optimization on each process. A-D: Distribution of solution times for HOSS (blue) and flat (orange) methods, for each of t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | <p>Optimizations were carried out using 200 start points for each method, launched on 16 processes on a 128-core server. Solution times were computed individually for each optimization on each process. A-D: Distribution of solution times for HOSS (blue) and flat (orange) methods, for each of the four models. HOSS converges faster. E-H: Distribution of initial cost (blue, green) and final cost (red = HOSS; orange = flat) for the two methods. HOSS produces better costs in most models but in one case (D3 EGFR) the distribution overlaps with the flat method.</p> |
|---|