Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows
<p dir="ltr">This dataset contains qualitative, open-ended survey responses in .csv file format from a study comparing the usability and user experience of a traditional 2D screen-based design system against a tablet-based Augmented Reality (AR) design system. The study focused on th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1852018286648098816 |
|---|---|
| author | Mustafa Kilinc (21708434) |
| author_facet | Mustafa Kilinc (21708434) |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Mustafa Kilinc (21708434) |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2025-07-22T18:21:38Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 10.25380/iastate.29619125.v1 |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Qualitative_User_Feedback_on_2D_Screen_vs_Tablet_Augmented_Reality_Design_Systems_in_Architectural_Renovation_Workflows/29619125 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Architectural design Graphics, augmented reality and games not elsewhere classified Information systems user experience design and development Architectural design Augmented Reality Architecture Human-Computer Interaction User Study User Experience Usability Design Technology |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Dataset info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion dataset |
| description | <p dir="ltr">This dataset contains qualitative, open-ended survey responses in .csv file format from a study comparing the usability and user experience of a traditional 2D screen-based design system against a tablet-based Augmented Reality (AR) design system. The study focused on their application in iterative architectural renovation design tasks. A total of 32 participants performed a kitchen renovation design task using both interfaces in a counterbalanced order. Following the use of each system, participants provided detailed feedback on their experience, including initial impressions, usability challenges, aspects that felt natural or awkward, and effects on their creative process. This dataset compiles their written responses, offering rich, contextual insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each interface from the user's perspective.</p> |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| id | Manara_c093fff2f4eae07dafb504f5ccfa1128 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.25380/iastate.29619125.v1 |
| network_acronym_str | Manara |
| network_name_str | ManaraRepo |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:figshare.com:article/29619125 |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 |
| spelling | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation WorkflowsMustafa Kilinc (21708434)Architectural designGraphics, augmented reality and games not elsewhere classifiedInformation systems user experience design and developmentArchitectural designAugmented RealityArchitectureHuman-Computer InteractionUser StudyUser ExperienceUsabilityDesign Technology<p dir="ltr">This dataset contains qualitative, open-ended survey responses in .csv file format from a study comparing the usability and user experience of a traditional 2D screen-based design system against a tablet-based Augmented Reality (AR) design system. The study focused on their application in iterative architectural renovation design tasks. A total of 32 participants performed a kitchen renovation design task using both interfaces in a counterbalanced order. Following the use of each system, participants provided detailed feedback on their experience, including initial impressions, usability challenges, aspects that felt natural or awkward, and effects on their creative process. This dataset compiles their written responses, offering rich, contextual insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each interface from the user's perspective.</p>2025-07-22T18:21:38ZDatasetinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiondataset10.25380/iastate.29619125.v1https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Qualitative_User_Feedback_on_2D_Screen_vs_Tablet_Augmented_Reality_Design_Systems_in_Architectural_Renovation_Workflows/29619125CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/296191252025-07-22T18:21:38Z |
| spellingShingle | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows Mustafa Kilinc (21708434) Architectural design Graphics, augmented reality and games not elsewhere classified Information systems user experience design and development Architectural design Augmented Reality Architecture Human-Computer Interaction User Study User Experience Usability Design Technology |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows |
| title_full | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows |
| title_fullStr | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows |
| title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows |
| title_short | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows |
| title_sort | Qualitative User Feedback on 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Renovation Workflows |
| topic | Architectural design Graphics, augmented reality and games not elsewhere classified Information systems user experience design and development Architectural design Augmented Reality Architecture Human-Computer Interaction User Study User Experience Usability Design Technology |