A zoomed-in view of participant 11 from Fig 8.

A zoomed-in view of participant 11 from Fig 8.

<p>Here, because of the expanded <i>y</i> axis, the lines from the fitted model can be seen. This shows the main effect of environment on eye visual angle (EVA): relative to Real targets, EVA was smaller for AR targets, and smaller for VR targets. The contrast coefficients (<a h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammed Safayet Arefin (22683505) (author)
Other Authors: John Edward Swan II (22683508) (author), Russell Cohen Hoffing (22683511) (author), Steven M. Thurman (8611647) (author)
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Neuroscience
Physiology
Pharmacology
Sociology
Mental Health
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
xlink "> recently
three different environments
significant main effect
repeated measures design
consistent individual differences
veridical depth estimate
including augmented reality
eye vergence angle
previously fixated targets
virtual target objects
target depth
virtual reality
fixated objects
virtual objects
vergence changes
eye fixations
starting depth
participants fixated
extended reality
virtual world
varying distances
results showed
natural settings
convergence vs
closer targets
changes constantly
13 participants
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<p>Here, because of the expanded <i>y</i> axis, the lines from the fitted model can be seen. This shows the main effect of environment on eye visual angle (EVA): relative to Real targets, EVA was smaller for AR targets, and smaller for VR targets. The contrast coefficients (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0333043#pone.0333043.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>) give these distances. x marks a_part = .79, the intercept for participant 11.</p>

Similar Items