A zoomed-in view of participant 11 from Fig 8.

<p>Here, because of the expanded <i>y</i> axis, the lines from the fitted model can be seen. This shows the main effect of environment on eye visual angle (EVA): relative to Real targets, EVA was smaller for AR targets, and smaller for VR targets. The contrast coefficients (<a h...

Повний опис

Збережено в:

Бібліографічні деталі
Автор:	Mohammed Safayet Arefin (22683505) (author)
Інші автори:	John Edward Swan II (22683508) (author), Russell Cohen Hoffing (22683511) (author), Steven M. Thurman (8611647) (author)
Опубліковано:	2025
Предмети:	Neuroscience Physiology Pharmacology Sociology Mental Health Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified xlink "> recently three different environments significant main effect repeated measures design consistent individual differences veridical depth estimate including augmented reality eye vergence angle previously fixated targets virtual target objects target depth virtual reality fixated objects virtual objects vergence changes eye fixations starting depth participants fixated extended reality virtual world varying distances results showed natural settings convergence vs closer targets changes constantly 13 participants
Теги:	Додати тег Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!

Опис
Резюме:	<p>Here, because of the expanded <i>y</i> axis, the lines from the fitted model can be seen. This shows the main effect of environment on eye visual angle (EVA): relative to Real targets, EVA was smaller for AR targets, and smaller for VR targets. The contrast coefficients (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0333043#pone.0333043.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>) give these distances. x marks a_part = .79, the intercept for participant 11.</p>

A zoomed-in view of participant 11 from Fig 8.

Схожі ресурси