Screening and health outcomes pathway.
<div><p>Background</p><p>Effective bowel cancer screening is freely available in Australia, however, there are inequities in utilisation amongst non-English speakers at home. This study estimates the health impacts and cost-effectiveness of recruitment interventions targeted...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , , , |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | <div><p>Background</p><p>Effective bowel cancer screening is freely available in Australia, however, there are inequities in utilisation amongst non-English speakers at home. This study estimates the health impacts and cost-effectiveness of recruitment interventions targeted at Arabic and Mandarin speaking populations in Victoria, Australia to increase bowel cancer screening participation.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A Markov microsimulation model simulated the development of bowel cancer, considering National Bowel Cancer Screening Program participation rates. Culturally specific recruitment interventions e.g., community education and tailored paid media for 50–74-year-olds were compared to usual practice. A cost-utility analysis was conducted over a 50-year time horizon from a healthcare perspective, to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) based on plausible effectiveness levels. Costs are in 2019 Australian dollars.</p><p>Results</p><p>Intervention costs were $6.90 per person for the Arabic speaking group and $3.10 for Mandarin speakers. The estimated cost/QALY was $2,781 (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: $2,144─$3,277) when screening increased by 0.2% in the Arabic group, and an estimated 5–6 additional adenoma and cancer cases were detected. In the Mandarin group, the estimated cost/QALY was $1,024/QALY (95%UI: $749─$1,272) when screening increased by 1.1%, and an estimated 18–23 additional adenoma and cancer cases were detected.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Culturally specific recruitment interventions to increase bowel cancer screening are inexpensive and likely to be cost-effective. Improvements in capturing language spoken at home by the National program would facilitate more precise estimates of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.</p></div> |
|---|