Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).

<p>Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).</p>

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: JoJo Yiying Zou (22676490) (author)
Other Authors: Shirley Lok Yi Ho (22676493) (author), Babak Hassan Beygi (22676496) (author), Changliang Luo (4537177) (author), Man Sang Wong (22676499) (author)
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1851480862273568768
author JoJo Yiying Zou (22676490)
author2 Shirley Lok Yi Ho (22676493)
Babak Hassan Beygi (22676496)
Changliang Luo (4537177)
Man Sang Wong (22676499)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet JoJo Yiying Zou (22676490)
Shirley Lok Yi Ho (22676493)
Babak Hassan Beygi (22676496)
Changliang Luo (4537177)
Man Sang Wong (22676499)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv JoJo Yiying Zou (22676490)
Shirley Lok Yi Ho (22676493)
Babak Hassan Beygi (22676496)
Changliang Luo (4537177)
Man Sang Wong (22676499)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-11-24T18:26:45Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0335472.t001
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Intra-operator_and_inter-rater_reliability_of_ultrasound_assessments_across_different_BMI_groups_n_165_/30696900
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biochemistry
Medicine
Biotechnology
Sociology
Science Policy
Space Science
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
lowest standard error
designing screening protocols
body mass index
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
76 – 0
73 – 0
0 – 17
ultrasound assessment may
st </ sup
nd </ sup
interpreting ultrasound measurements
85 ), compared
3 – 15
spinous process method
lateral spinal curvature
assess spinal curvature
ultrasound imaging using
second bmi tertile
correlating ultrasound angles
1 )= 0
1 &# 8211
weight group demonstrated
2 </ sup
1 – 24
2 – 18
spinal curvature
weight group
ultrasound assessments
ray using
iccs ),
cobb angles
3 °).
&# 178
invasive method
cobb method
bmi group
rater 1
xlink ">
tissue conditions
suspected ais
study investigated
rater 2
radiographic assessments
neither minimal
findings suggest
bmi tertiles
age percentiles
age classification
8 kg
7 kg
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Dataset
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dataset
description <p>Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).</p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara_e140809f2a6dd02eb96bcc85e6ad6a6e
identifier_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0335472.t001
network_acronym_str Manara
network_name_str ManaraRepo
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/30696900
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).JoJo Yiying Zou (22676490)Shirley Lok Yi Ho (22676493)Babak Hassan Beygi (22676496)Changliang Luo (4537177)Man Sang Wong (22676499)BiochemistryMedicineBiotechnologySociologyScience PolicySpace ScienceBiological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedlowest standard errordesigning screening protocolsbody mass indexadolescent idiopathic scoliosis76 – 073 – 00 – 17ultrasound assessment mayst </ supnd </ supinterpreting ultrasound measurements85 ), compared3 – 15spinous process methodlateral spinal curvatureassess spinal curvatureultrasound imaging usingsecond bmi tertilecorrelating ultrasound angles1 )= 01 &# 8211weight group demonstrated2 </ sup1 – 242 – 18spinal curvatureweight groupultrasound assessmentsray usingiccs ),cobb angles3 °).&# 178invasive methodcobb methodbmi grouprater 1xlink ">tissue conditionssuspected aisstudy investigatedrater 2radiographic assessmentsneither minimalfindings suggestbmi tertilesage percentilesage classification8 kg7 kg<p>Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).</p>2025-11-24T18:26:45ZDatasetinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiondataset10.1371/journal.pone.0335472.t001https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Intra-operator_and_inter-rater_reliability_of_ultrasound_assessments_across_different_BMI_groups_n_165_/30696900CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/306969002025-11-24T18:26:45Z
spellingShingle Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
JoJo Yiying Zou (22676490)
Biochemistry
Medicine
Biotechnology
Sociology
Science Policy
Space Science
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
lowest standard error
designing screening protocols
body mass index
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
76 – 0
73 – 0
0 – 17
ultrasound assessment may
st </ sup
nd </ sup
interpreting ultrasound measurements
85 ), compared
3 – 15
spinous process method
lateral spinal curvature
assess spinal curvature
ultrasound imaging using
second bmi tertile
correlating ultrasound angles
1 )= 0
1 &# 8211
weight group demonstrated
2 </ sup
1 – 24
2 – 18
spinal curvature
weight group
ultrasound assessments
ray using
iccs ),
cobb angles
3 °).
&# 178
invasive method
cobb method
bmi group
rater 1
xlink ">
tissue conditions
suspected ais
study investigated
rater 2
radiographic assessments
neither minimal
findings suggest
bmi tertiles
age percentiles
age classification
8 kg
7 kg
status_str publishedVersion
title Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
title_full Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
title_fullStr Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
title_full_unstemmed Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
title_short Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
title_sort Intra-operator and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessments across different BMI groups (n = 165).
topic Biochemistry
Medicine
Biotechnology
Sociology
Science Policy
Space Science
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
lowest standard error
designing screening protocols
body mass index
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
76 – 0
73 – 0
0 – 17
ultrasound assessment may
st </ sup
nd </ sup
interpreting ultrasound measurements
85 ), compared
3 – 15
spinous process method
lateral spinal curvature
assess spinal curvature
ultrasound imaging using
second bmi tertile
correlating ultrasound angles
1 )= 0
1 &# 8211
weight group demonstrated
2 </ sup
1 – 24
2 – 18
spinal curvature
weight group
ultrasound assessments
ray using
iccs ),
cobb angles
3 °).
&# 178
invasive method
cobb method
bmi group
rater 1
xlink ">
tissue conditions
suspected ais
study investigated
rater 2
radiographic assessments
neither minimal
findings suggest
bmi tertiles
age percentiles
age classification
8 kg
7 kg