Table 2 -

Table 2 -

<p>Results of the multiple regression (MR) models with the lowest AICc value for each response variable, where the full model contained honey bee abundance, flower abundance, flower species richness, number of collection rounds, the interactions between honey bee abundance and flower abundance...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Sydney H. Worthy (16541959) (author)
Other Authors:	John H. Acorn (4859542) (author), Carol M. Frost (2927793) (author)
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Cell Biology Evolutionary Biology Ecology Plant Biology Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified mounting evidence suggests increased conservation concerns div >< p apis mellifera </ honey bees (< contribute pollination services >) may reduce managed honey bees wild pollinator community honey bee abundance flower species richness honey bees pollinator community pollination services species richness managed pollinators flower abundance bee pollinators wild pollinators species composition interaction richness valuable contributors term impact significant relationship results suggest insect pollinators habitat loss flowering crops firmly established canada support biodiversity metrics biodiversity measures abundance affects
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Results for PERMANOVA tests for effects of honey bees on pollinator species composition with Jaccard dissimilarity.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Results for PERMANOVA tests for effects of honey bees on pollinator species composition with Bray-Curtis dissimilarity.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Results of the simple linear regression (SLR) models with the lowest AICc values for each response variable, where honey bee abundance as the only predictor variable.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

NMDS Plot of flower visitor species composition per transect.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Scatterplot of honey bee abundance against full-season pan-trapped beetle diversity.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Visual representation of the ten datasets tested in this study.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Map of the research location, Mattheis Ranch, in southern Alberta, Canada.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

S6 Fig -
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Total abundance of honey bees caught visiting flowers pooled across all transects.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Visual representation of the spatial autocorrelation of the residuals for the two response variables that did require special correlation structures.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Visual representation of the spatial autocorrelation of residuals for each response variable against honey bee abundance for response variables that did not need a special correlation structure.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Honey bee abundance in pan traps, pooled across the full season per transect, with transects ordered by increasing honey bee abundance, and coloured by distance from nearest bee hives.
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Abundance of honey bees caught visiting flowers (Dataset 1).
by: Sydney H. Worthy (16541959)
Published: (2024)

Species traits, landscape quality and floral resource overlap with honeybees determine virus transmission in plant-pollinator networks
by: Corina Maurer (17863966)
Published: (2024)

Data and R code from: Managed honey bees aggravate pollination challenges for pollen-limited species in alpine meadows
by: Erliang Gao (13180272)
Published: (2025)

Mixed effects of honey bees on pollination function in the Tibetan alpine grasslands
by: Lin-Lin Wang (16547643)
Published: (2024)

Effects of agroecological zones, seasons and cucurbit species on visitation rate European honey bees and hoverflies on cucurbit flowers.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Effects of agroecological zones, seasons and cucurbit species on visitation frequency European honey bees and hoverflies on cucurbit flowers.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Effects of agroecological zones, seasons and cucurbit species on visitation abundance of European honey bees and hoverflies on cucurbit flowers.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Flowers variables of the three cucurbits under the study.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Visitation abundance of European honey bees and hoverflies in three cucurbit species.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Visitation rate on cucurbit flowers as affected by season, agroecological zones and cucurbit species.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Visitation frequency on cucurbit flowers as affected by season, agroecological zones and cucurbit species.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Visitation abundance on cucurbit flowers as affected by season, agroecological zones and cucurbit species.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Temporal variation on the visitation rate in the Plateau and Mountainous zones during October-November season.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Temporal variation on the visitation rate in the Plateau and Mountainous zones during May-June season.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Temporal variation on the visitation frequency in the Plateau and Mountainous zones during the season of October-November.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Temporal variation on the visitation frequency in the Plateau and Mountainous zones during the season of May-June.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Temporal variation on the visitation abundance in the Mountainous and Plateau zone during the October-November.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Temporal variation on the visitation abundance in the Mountainous and Plateau zone during the May-June.
by: Elvillah William Rweyemamu (21354356)
Published: (2025)

Honey bee (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) and wild bee resource competition: how big is this problem?
by: Clare Rittschof (14503166)
Published: (2025)

Table 1_Microorganism changes in the gut of Apis mellifera surviving for the long term in Camellia oleifera forests.docx
by: Longsheng Chen (5825540)
Published: (2025)

Nectar sugar concentration contributes to structuring bumble bee and plant interactions
by: Han-Ning Lun (19070669)
Published: (2025)

Urban farm pollinator and survey data
by: Chelse Prather (4735215)
Published: (2025)

<b>Supplementary material for "Pollinators in Mexico. Spatial patterns show exceptions to global trends"</b>
by: Angela Nava-Bolaños (3104145)
Published: (2025)

Appendix S1.docx
by: Elena Zioga (14032959)
Published: (2025)

Predicted <i>Varroa</i> intensity and daily <i>Varroa</i> growth rate from multiple regression model (with spatial component) assuming “Monitor + Treat” management strategy and “Supplemental feeding.” Values are estimated for varying apiary density, from 0 to 60 apiaries within a 5 km radius. May 1 intensity is the mean <i>Varroa</i> intensity (mites per 300 bees) predicted for May 1; Growth rate is the daily growth rate of <i>Varroa</i> as a multiplicative factor; Growth % is the daily growth rate of <i>Varroa</i> as percent change (0–100).
by: Laura Boehm Vock (22008756)
Published: (2025)

Predicted <i>Varroa</i> intensity and daily <i>Varroa</i> growth rate from multiple regression model with spatial component. Values are estimated for an apiary density of 5 apiaries within 5 km (the median value). May 1 intensity is the mean <i>Varroa</i> intensity (mites per 300 bees) predicted for May 1; Growth rate is the daily growth rate of <i>Varroa</i> as a multiplicative factor; Growth % is the daily growth rate of <i>Varroa</i> as percent change (0–100).
by: Laura Boehm Vock (22008756)
Published: (2025)

Comparison of models predicting <i>Varroa</i> intensity, without spatial component. For each variable, we fit an additive model and interaction with time; the model preferred by AIC is presented here. This table includes the results of the additive model for Floral quality, Insecticide, and Nesting quality. The remaining models include the indicated variables and interaction with time. Statistics presented are: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), % of Deviance explained (a metric similar to but more appropriate for negative binomial regression), Relative Error (RelErr = Mean(), Mean Absolute Error (MAE = Mean()). Relative error is computed relative to the baseline non-spatial model (time only). The best model for each statistic is bolded. There is no clear winner among the models for all criteria, however all the highlighted models include Management as a variable.
by: Laura Boehm Vock (22008756)
Published: (2025)

Comparison of models predicting <i>Varroa</i> intensity, with spatial component. For each variable, we fit an additive model and interaction with time; the model preferred by AIC is presented here. This table includes the results of the additive model for Floral quality, Insecticide, and Nesting quality. The remaining models include the indicated variables and interaction with time. Note that management practices are correlated with location, leading to possible overfitting in models that include the management variable. Statistics presentedeak are: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), % of Deviance explained (a metric similar to but more appropriate for negative binomial regression), Relative Error (RelErr = Mean(), Mean Absolute Erroreak (MAE = Mean()). The null model uses overall mean <i>Varroa</i> intensity as the predicted value (). The best model for each statistic is bolded. There is no clear winner among the models for all criteria.
by: Laura Boehm Vock (22008756)
Published: (2025)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_roig9v0t7n4284vrk53qvfvht5