Distributions of the goodness-of-fit (GoF) values for all tested approaches and parameter spaces.

Similar Items

• Reliability of the optimized frequency parameters and sFC matrix edges in the high-dimensional cases as well as of the GoF.
  by: Kevin J. Wischnewski (21354521)
  Published: (2025)
• <b> </b> GoF values for males and females together with the corresponding effect sizes (ES) of the observed differences. (A-B) Colored boxplots show the distributions of the median model fits obtained for males (brown) and females (pink) in 30 algorithm executions with random initial data (option 2, see Methods). The considered dimensions of the parameter spaces combined with the group abbreviations of males (M) or females (F) are indicated on the horizontal axes along with the detected GoF values on the vertical axes. Solid vertical lines separate the results for the Schaefer atlas (Sch100) and the Harvard-Oxford atlas (HO0Thr). The names of the utilized optimization algorithms are given in the titles. Statistically significant sex differences as assessed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test are marked with an asterisk. The significance level of 5%, < 0.05, has been Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons. The corrected -values of the sex differences are indicated in the plots. (C
  by: Kevin J. Wischnewski (21354521)
  Published: (2025)
• Example of the results of the model fitting in the 103-dimensional parameter space.
  by: Kevin J. Wischnewski (21354521)
  Published: (2025)
• Model-based sex classification accuracies.
  by: Kevin J. Wischnewski (21354521)
  Published: (2025)
• Distributions of optimized coupling parameters and median FC strengths for males and females.
  by: Kevin J. Wischnewski (21354521)
  Published: (2025)