Comparison of neural signal preprocessing methods and their impact on classification performance.
<p><b>A</b>, Comparison of neural signal preprocessing strategies: The upper panel illustrates the time-interval-based preprocessing method (quantifying spike counts within fixed time windows); the lower panel shows the equal-segment-based preprocessing method (dividing decision ti...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | , , |
| منشور في: |
2025
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | <p><b>A</b>, Comparison of neural signal preprocessing strategies: The upper panel illustrates the time-interval-based preprocessing method (quantifying spike counts within fixed time windows); the lower panel shows the equal-segment-based preprocessing method (dividing decision time uniformly across trials and calculating spike counts within each segment). Due to significant variations in decision times across trials, the equal-segment-based approach enables standardized dimensional representation of data from different trials, effectively minimizing interference from redundant information. <b>B</b>, Performance comparison of preprocessing methods: Scatter plot showing classification accuracy of the CA-BiLSTM model for individual mouse samples under different preprocessing approaches, with triangular markers indicating mean accuracy across all mice. Results demonstrate that the equal-segment-based preprocessing method yields significantly higher accuracy for the majority of samples, validating the effectiveness of the proposed preprocessing strategy.</p> |
|---|