Within-group comparisons of trunk muscle activation measurements in the amputee group.

Within-group comparisons of trunk muscle activation measurements in the amputee group.

<p>Within-group comparisons of trunk muscle activation measurements in the amputee group.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Hüseyin Çelik (22319830) (author)
Other Authors:	Mustafa Cem Türkmen (22319833) (author), Ali İmran Yalçın (20853839) (author), Semra Topuz (6420176) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Biochemistry Cell Biology Genetics Neuroscience Physiology Developmental Biology Science Policy Mental Health Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified trunk muscle activations sectional study included preliminary observational cross pilot study aimed bertec force platform trunk muscle activation longissimus dorsi activation external oblique activation measured bilaterally using transtibial amputee group unilateral transtibial amputees controls &# 8217 healthy control group amputated side compared transtibial amputees multifidus activation amputated side group differences postural control healthy controls nondominant side intact side dominant side postural sway eyes open eyes closed compliant surface assessed using 05 ).
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Inter-group differences in trunk muscle activation measurements.
by: Hüseyin Çelik (22319830)
Published: (2025)

Inter-group differences in postural control measurements.
by: Hüseyin Çelik (22319830)
Published: (2025)

Demographic and amputation-specific characteristics of the participants.
by: Hüseyin Çelik (22319830)
Published: (2025)

Participant flowchart diagram.
by: Hüseyin Çelik (22319830)
Published: (2025)

Processed dataset used to generate the main figures and tables.
by: Hüseyin Çelik (22319830)
Published: (2025)

Raw data used for the statistical analyses presented in the manuscript.
by: Hüseyin Çelik (22319830)
Published: (2025)

Mean rating of perceived exertion.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Instrumented pedal data means for the unaffected and affected legs.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Fig 7 -
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Mean muscle activity in the unaffected and affected legs in relation to the crank angle.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Mean muscle activity for all seat heights in both the unaffected and affected legs.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Joint movement data throughout the cycle in the affected leg for the hip joint.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Joint movement data throughout the cycle in the affected leg for the knee joint.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Experimental environment.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Graphical representation of the saddle heights used during the experiment (+7%, +3.5%, 0, -3.5%, and -7%), tracking points, and calculated angles.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Full results.
by: Heloisa Seratiuk Flores (20521658)
Published: (2025)

Impact of Pilates training on gait performance in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation
by: Janny Mirian Antonelli Tavares (22452771)
Published: (2025)

Data in long format
by: Caelyn Hirschman (12741089)
Published: (2024)

Normalized lateral trunk lean angle. (A) Transtibial and (B) Transfemoral amputee. Each colour represents the pose estimation used: OpenPose (blue) and the zero-shot method (red). Positive angles indicate trunk lean to the ipsilateral side, and negative angles indicate trunk lean to the contralateral side.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Promoting universal health coverage for amputees in Uganda throughsocial enterprise and engineering innovation
by: Robert Tamale Ssekitoleko (12275856)
Published: (2024)

Demographic and clinical characteristics of amputee patients (N = 893). This table presents the distribution of amputation levels, causes, age groups, and gender in the study population.
by: Mahmoud Alfatafta (11270124)
Published: (2025)

The Effects of Leg Prosthesis Stiffness and Take-off Board Stiffness on Long Jump Performance: Statistics, figures, and corresponding data
by: Kara Ashcraft (16511067)
Published: (2025)

Multiple regression analysis result.
by: Tahereh Alavi (21713872)
Published: (2025)

Relationship between quality of life and the associated variables.
by: Tahereh Alavi (21713872)
Published: (2025)

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied population (n = 168).
by: Tahereh Alavi (21713872)
Published: (2025)

The values behind the means, standard deviations.
by: Tahereh Alavi (21713872)
Published: (2025)

Transfemoral amputees stand-up and sit-down with their prescribed microprocessor prostheses. Full-body motion capture and intact-side lower limb EMGs are included.
by: Grace Hunt (19119316)
Published: (2024)

Different case examples. (A) In the original image, the left limb is positioned in front. However, upon generating the synthetic image, the left leg was positioned backward, and this discrepancy persisted after the application of OpenPose, where the dark blue line represents the left leg. (B) Case example where the generation of the synthetic image fails to change the prosthetic limb to an intact limb. (C). Case example where the generation of the synthetic image successfully changes the prosthetic limb to an intact limb.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Normalized kinematics results for transfemoral. Top and bottom rows represent hip, knee, and ankle kinematics, respectively, on the left (blue; intact) and right (red; prosthetic) limb. (A) Kinematics comparing the ground truth (solid line) and OpenPose (dotted line). (B) Kinematics comparing the ground truth (solid line) and zero-shot method (dotted line). Positive hip and knee joint angles indicate flexion, negative angles indicate extension. Positive ankle joint angles indicate dorsiflexion, negative angles indicate plantarflexion. Some key differences in kinematics between the prosthetic and intact limbs are marked by arrows
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Normalized kinematics results for transtibial. Top and bottom rows represent hip, knee, and ankle kinematics, respectively, on the left (blue; intact) and right (red; prosthetic) limb. (A) Kinematics comparing the ground truth (solid line) and OpenPose (dotted line). (B) Kinematics comparing the ground truth (solid line) and zero-shot method (dotted line). Positive hip and knee joint angles indicate flexion, negative angles indicate extension. Positive ankle joint angles indicate dorsiflexion, negative angles indicate plantarflexion. Some key differences in kinematics between the prosthetic and intact limbs are marked with arrows
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

The percentage of failures in each video. Values are expressed as percentages based on a total of 180 frames. Each graph shows the percentage of frames where lower-limb keypoints were not identified fully. Each colour represents the different camera positions.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Workflow of the proposed zero-shot method. (A) The standard workflow for applying pose estimation (e.g., OpenPose) directly on the original image. In this example, OpenPose fails to accurately identify keypoints on the prosthetic limb, as highlighted by the red circle. (B) The proposed zero-shot workflow leverages ControlNet. The original image is processed using the Canny edge detector to generate an edge map, which is then passed through Stable Diffusion to create a synthetic image. This synthetic image is subsequently used for pose estimation. In this case, improvements in pose estimation accuracy, particularly in the identification of lower-limb keypoints, are evident, as highlighted in the red circle.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Number of frames where the likelihood is less than 0.50.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Joint angle error (MAE) when comparing manual annotation and the different pose estimations.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Individual keypoints coordinates error (MAE) when comparing manual annotation and the different pose estimations. It is established here that DeepLabCut is satisfactory to be used as ground truth labels.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Review of literature that has assessed the accuracy of OpenPose on gait analysis.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Joint angle error (MAE) when comparing DeepLabCut (ground truth) and OpenPose.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Individual keypoints coordinates error (MAE) when comparing DeepLabCut (treated as ground truth) and OpenPose.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Number of frames with issues in each camera view based on each method.
by: Tianxun Zhou (16946230)
Published: (2025)

Mean (SD) Fabrication Time by Group.
by: Stefania Fatone (3834499)
Published: (2025)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6ksf02rcrg50pvph0rong3i65u