Experimental Design and Procedure.

<p><b>(A)</b> Participants with scores ≥24 on the Shipley underwent all experimental tasks in the following fixed order: Verbal Completion Task (VCT), Verbal Discrimination Task (VDT), and Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST). <b>(B)</b> At encoding, participants were present...

Full beskrivning

Sparad:
Bibliografiska uppgifter
Huvudupphovsman: Ariana Youm (22676310) (author)
Övriga upphovsmän: Melanie Cohn (438056) (author), Katherine Duncan (8201052) (author)
Publicerad: 2025
Ämnen:
Taggar: Lägg till en tagg
Inga taggar, Lägg till första taggen!
_version_ 1849927643705638912
author Ariana Youm (22676310)
author2 Melanie Cohn (438056)
Katherine Duncan (8201052)
author2_role author
author
author_facet Ariana Youm (22676310)
Melanie Cohn (438056)
Katherine Duncan (8201052)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ariana Youm (22676310)
Melanie Cohn (438056)
Katherine Duncan (8201052)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-11-24T18:22:57Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0336045.g001
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Experimental_Design_and_Procedure_/30696471
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Neuroscience
Evolutionary Biology
Sociology
Developmental Biology
Science Policy
Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
verbal discrimination task
subset also completed
shift remains mixed
semantically similar content
perceptually similar lures
many studies suggest
current study aimed
older adults show
verbal completion task
mnemonic similarity task
episodic memory specificity
six younger adults
xlink "> aging
memory specificity may
vdt ), suggesting
memory specificity
younger adults
semantic similarity
pattern completion
mst ),
strictly rooted
spatial processing
semantic representations
results showed
related differences
perceptual domains
pattern separation
part due
others indicate
object mst
minimize reliance
impairment reflects
heightened tendency
generalized reduction
findings go
executive functioning
direct comparison
commonly measured
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Experimental Design and Procedure.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Image
Figure
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
image
description <p><b>(A)</b> Participants with scores ≥24 on the Shipley underwent all experimental tasks in the following fixed order: Verbal Completion Task (VCT), Verbal Discrimination Task (VDT), and Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST). <b>(B)</b> At encoding, participants were presented with a series of sentences that each contained one capitalized target word. Participants read each sentence out loud and then rated how well they knew the target word (1 = “don’t know,” 2 = “kind of know,” and 3 = “know very well”). The structure of the encoding task was the same for the VCT and VDT, but the number of trials differed. During the VCT, participants were presented with 24 sentences (20 target, 2 beginning buffers, and 2 ending buffers), and during the VDT, with 84 sentences (80 target, 2 beginning buffers, and 2 ending buffers). <b>(C)</b> VCT retrieval consisted of two blocks: Inclusion and Exclusion. For Inclusion, participants were instructed to complete the cue with a word they had just studied. For Exclusion, participants were instructed to complete the cue with a word they had never seen before in the context of the experiment. <b>(D)</b> During VDT retrieval, participants engaged in a recognition memory test in which they identified each item as “old” or “new” with a button press. Forty words were exact repetitions of words presented in the encoding phase (targets); 40 were synonyms of those seen during the encoding phase but not identical (lures); 40 were new words not previously seen (foils). (E) 33/66 younger and 35/66 older adults completed the MST (old/new version; [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0336045#pone.0336045.ref015" target="_blank">15</a>]). During encoding, participants judged whether each object was commonly found indoors or outdoors. At retrieval, participants engaged in a recognition memory test in which they identified each item as “old” or “new” with a button press. 40 were exact repetitions of images presented in the encoding phase (targets); 40 were similar images to those seen during the encoding phase but not identical (lures); 40 were new images not previously seen (foils).</p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara_f44ab1387320f81a057b78f9976dee97
identifier_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0336045.g001
network_acronym_str Manara
network_name_str ManaraRepo
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/30696471
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Experimental Design and Procedure.Ariana Youm (22676310)Melanie Cohn (438056)Katherine Duncan (8201052)NeuroscienceEvolutionary BiologySociologyDevelopmental BiologyScience PolicyEnvironmental Sciences not elsewhere classifiedBiological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedverbal discrimination tasksubset also completedshift remains mixedsemantically similar contentperceptually similar luresmany studies suggestcurrent study aimedolder adults showverbal completion taskmnemonic similarity taskepisodic memory specificitysix younger adultsxlink "> agingmemory specificity mayvdt ), suggestingmemory specificityyounger adultssemantic similaritypattern completionmst ),strictly rootedspatial processingsemantic representationsresults showedrelated differencesperceptual domainspattern separationpart dueothers indicateobject mstminimize relianceimpairment reflectsheightened tendencygeneralized reductionfindings goexecutive functioningdirect comparisoncommonly measured<p><b>(A)</b> Participants with scores ≥24 on the Shipley underwent all experimental tasks in the following fixed order: Verbal Completion Task (VCT), Verbal Discrimination Task (VDT), and Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST). <b>(B)</b> At encoding, participants were presented with a series of sentences that each contained one capitalized target word. Participants read each sentence out loud and then rated how well they knew the target word (1 = “don’t know,” 2 = “kind of know,” and 3 = “know very well”). The structure of the encoding task was the same for the VCT and VDT, but the number of trials differed. During the VCT, participants were presented with 24 sentences (20 target, 2 beginning buffers, and 2 ending buffers), and during the VDT, with 84 sentences (80 target, 2 beginning buffers, and 2 ending buffers). <b>(C)</b> VCT retrieval consisted of two blocks: Inclusion and Exclusion. For Inclusion, participants were instructed to complete the cue with a word they had just studied. For Exclusion, participants were instructed to complete the cue with a word they had never seen before in the context of the experiment. <b>(D)</b> During VDT retrieval, participants engaged in a recognition memory test in which they identified each item as “old” or “new” with a button press. Forty words were exact repetitions of words presented in the encoding phase (targets); 40 were synonyms of those seen during the encoding phase but not identical (lures); 40 were new words not previously seen (foils). (E) 33/66 younger and 35/66 older adults completed the MST (old/new version; [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0336045#pone.0336045.ref015" target="_blank">15</a>]). During encoding, participants judged whether each object was commonly found indoors or outdoors. At retrieval, participants engaged in a recognition memory test in which they identified each item as “old” or “new” with a button press. 40 were exact repetitions of images presented in the encoding phase (targets); 40 were similar images to those seen during the encoding phase but not identical (lures); 40 were new images not previously seen (foils).</p>2025-11-24T18:22:57ZImageFigureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionimage10.1371/journal.pone.0336045.g001https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Experimental_Design_and_Procedure_/30696471CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/306964712025-11-24T18:22:57Z
spellingShingle Experimental Design and Procedure.
Ariana Youm (22676310)
Neuroscience
Evolutionary Biology
Sociology
Developmental Biology
Science Policy
Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
verbal discrimination task
subset also completed
shift remains mixed
semantically similar content
perceptually similar lures
many studies suggest
current study aimed
older adults show
verbal completion task
mnemonic similarity task
episodic memory specificity
six younger adults
xlink "> aging
memory specificity may
vdt ), suggesting
memory specificity
younger adults
semantic similarity
pattern completion
mst ),
strictly rooted
spatial processing
semantic representations
results showed
related differences
perceptual domains
pattern separation
part due
others indicate
object mst
minimize reliance
impairment reflects
heightened tendency
generalized reduction
findings go
executive functioning
direct comparison
commonly measured
status_str publishedVersion
title Experimental Design and Procedure.
title_full Experimental Design and Procedure.
title_fullStr Experimental Design and Procedure.
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Design and Procedure.
title_short Experimental Design and Procedure.
title_sort Experimental Design and Procedure.
topic Neuroscience
Evolutionary Biology
Sociology
Developmental Biology
Science Policy
Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
verbal discrimination task
subset also completed
shift remains mixed
semantically similar content
perceptually similar lures
many studies suggest
current study aimed
older adults show
verbal completion task
mnemonic similarity task
episodic memory specificity
six younger adults
xlink "> aging
memory specificity may
vdt ), suggesting
memory specificity
younger adults
semantic similarity
pattern completion
mst ),
strictly rooted
spatial processing
semantic representations
results showed
related differences
perceptual domains
pattern separation
part due
others indicate
object mst
minimize reliance
impairment reflects
heightened tendency
generalized reduction
findings go
executive functioning
direct comparison
commonly measured