On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings

The purpose of this paper is to introduce two new classes of rings that are closely related to the classes of Dedekind domains and Krull domains. Let H = {R | R is a commutative ring with 1 and Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal of R}. Let R in H, T(R) be the total quotient ring of R, and let phi be th...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Badawi, Ayman (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Anderson, David F. (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2005
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/11073/9222
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513442033958912
author Badawi, Ayman
author2 Anderson, David F.
author2_role author
author_facet Badawi, Ayman
Anderson, David F.
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Badawi, Ayman
Anderson, David F.
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005
2018-02-28T04:36:55Z
2018-02-28T04:36:55Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv Anderson, D. F., & Badawi, A. (2005). On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings. Houston journal of mathematics, 31(4), 1007-1022.
0362-1588
http://hdl.handle.net/11073/9222
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en_US
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Houston
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.math.uh.edu/~hjm/Vol31-4.html
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Published version
Peer-Reviewed
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description The purpose of this paper is to introduce two new classes of rings that are closely related to the classes of Dedekind domains and Krull domains. Let H = {R | R is a commutative ring with 1 and Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal of R}. Let R in H, T(R) be the total quotient ring of R, and let phi be the map from R into RNil(R) (the localization of R at Nil(R)) such that phi(a/b) = a/b for every a in R and b in R\ Z(R). Then phi is a ring homomorphism from T(R) into RNil(R), and phi restricted to R is also a ring homomorphism from R into RNil(R) given by phi(x) = x /1 for every x in R. A nonnil ideal I of R is said to be phi-invertible if phi(I) is an invertible ideal of phi(R). If every nonnil ideal of R is phi-invertible, then we say that R is a phi-Dedekind ring. Also, we say that R is a phi-Krull ring if phi(R) is the intersection of {Vi}, where each Vi is a discrete phi-chained overring of phi(R), and for every nonnilpotent element x in R , phi(x) is a unit in all but finitely many Vi. We show that the theories of phi-Dedekind and phi-Krull rings resemble those of Dedekind and Krull domains.
format article
id aus_4553620c221d076003de5483bbd4f473
identifier_str_mv Anderson, D. F., & Badawi, A. (2005). On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings. Houston journal of mathematics, 31(4), 1007-1022.
0362-1588
language_invalid_str_mv en_US
network_acronym_str aus
network_name_str aus
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.aus.edu:11073/9222
publishDate 2005
publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Houston
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull ringsBadawi, AymanAnderson, David F.The purpose of this paper is to introduce two new classes of rings that are closely related to the classes of Dedekind domains and Krull domains. Let H = {R | R is a commutative ring with 1 and Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal of R}. Let R in H, T(R) be the total quotient ring of R, and let phi be the map from R into RNil(R) (the localization of R at Nil(R)) such that phi(a/b) = a/b for every a in R and b in R\ Z(R). Then phi is a ring homomorphism from T(R) into RNil(R), and phi restricted to R is also a ring homomorphism from R into RNil(R) given by phi(x) = x /1 for every x in R. A nonnil ideal I of R is said to be phi-invertible if phi(I) is an invertible ideal of phi(R). If every nonnil ideal of R is phi-invertible, then we say that R is a phi-Dedekind ring. Also, we say that R is a phi-Krull ring if phi(R) is the intersection of {Vi}, where each Vi is a discrete phi-chained overring of phi(R), and for every nonnilpotent element x in R , phi(x) is a unit in all but finitely many Vi. We show that the theories of phi-Dedekind and phi-Krull rings resemble those of Dedekind and Krull domains.University of Houston2018-02-28T04:36:55Z2018-02-28T04:36:55Z2005Published versionPeer-Reviewedinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfAnderson, D. F., & Badawi, A. (2005). On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings. Houston journal of mathematics, 31(4), 1007-1022.0362-1588http://hdl.handle.net/11073/9222en_UShttp://www.math.uh.edu/~hjm/Vol31-4.htmloai:repository.aus.edu:11073/92222024-08-22T12:01:52Z
spellingShingle On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
Badawi, Ayman
status_str publishedVersion
title On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
title_full On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
title_fullStr On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
title_full_unstemmed On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
title_short On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
title_sort On phi-Dedekind rings and phi-Krull rings
url http://hdl.handle.net/11073/9222