Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey

Since the 1980s, assessment has been one of the most frequently investigated topics in library and information science literature, seen by librarians as a valid tool for analyzing the effectiveness and impact of teaching. With this in mind, after the Paris workshop and the rollout of the co-designed...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Stöpel, Michael (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Piotto, Livia (author), Furno, Christine (author), Spasov, Krasimir (author), Zargaryan, Tatev (author)
التنسيق: bookPart
منشور في: 2020
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/11073/21286
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513440697024512
author Stöpel, Michael
author2 Piotto, Livia
Furno, Christine
Spasov, Krasimir
Zargaryan, Tatev
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet Stöpel, Michael
Piotto, Livia
Furno, Christine
Spasov, Krasimir
Zargaryan, Tatev
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Stöpel, Michael
Piotto, Livia
Furno, Christine
Spasov, Krasimir
Zargaryan, Tatev
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2021-01-28T04:29:05Z
2021-01-28T04:29:05Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv Stöpel, M., Piotto, L., Furno, C., Spasov, K., & Zargaryan, T. (2020). Insights into faculty-librarian collaborations around the framework: Findings from the 2018 co-design survey. In Stöpel, M., Piotto, L., Goodman, X., & Godbey, S. (Eds.), Faculty-Librarian Collaborations: Integrating the Information Literacy Framework into Disciplinary Courses (pp. 21-34). Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL).
9780838948538
http://hdl.handle.net/11073/21286
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en_US
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL)
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Published version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
description Since the 1980s, assessment has been one of the most frequently investigated topics in library and information science literature, seen by librarians as a valid tool for analyzing the effectiveness and impact of teaching. With this in mind, after the Paris workshop and the rollout of the co-designed pilot courses, the AMICAL Information Literacy Committee (ILC) wanted to assess whether the courses had been successful with regard to both learning and teaching and to determine new fruits the co-designing had produced. A second, but equally important, motivation was to report back to the AMICAL Consortium, which funded and supported our project from the beginning. The main goal was to collect qualitative feedback to give insight into the projects and to build a "thick description" of the teaching experience. In order to effectively assess the course design project, as well as provide essential feedback to our stakeholders, the ILC developed and administered a survey about the co-design experience. This survey was conducted among twenty-six participants from eleven different liberal arts institutions outside the United States that are all members of the AMICAL Consortium (appendix 2A). The survey participants came from diverse countries: Lebanon, Armenia, the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Kuwait, Italy, Switzerland, Kyrgyzstan, Bulgaria, Kosovo, and France. It is interesting to see how the teaching experience and the idea of liberal arts education unfolds within the local contexts of these different cultures as well as different disciplines. For instance, for a better understanding of classroom dynamics, aspects such as attitudes toward female teachers or methods used to teach history in different countries must be taken into account when analyzing responses.
format bookPart
id aus_775ba3d7a3b75b625c5212215e78d2f6
identifier_str_mv Stöpel, M., Piotto, L., Furno, C., Spasov, K., & Zargaryan, T. (2020). Insights into faculty-librarian collaborations around the framework: Findings from the 2018 co-design survey. In Stöpel, M., Piotto, L., Goodman, X., & Godbey, S. (Eds.), Faculty-Librarian Collaborations: Integrating the Information Literacy Framework into Disciplinary Courses (pp. 21-34). Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL).
9780838948538
language_invalid_str_mv en_US
network_acronym_str aus
network_name_str aus
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.aus.edu:11073/21286
publishDate 2020
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design SurveyStöpel, MichaelPiotto, LiviaFurno, ChristineSpasov, KrasimirZargaryan, TatevSince the 1980s, assessment has been one of the most frequently investigated topics in library and information science literature, seen by librarians as a valid tool for analyzing the effectiveness and impact of teaching. With this in mind, after the Paris workshop and the rollout of the co-designed pilot courses, the AMICAL Information Literacy Committee (ILC) wanted to assess whether the courses had been successful with regard to both learning and teaching and to determine new fruits the co-designing had produced. A second, but equally important, motivation was to report back to the AMICAL Consortium, which funded and supported our project from the beginning. The main goal was to collect qualitative feedback to give insight into the projects and to build a "thick description" of the teaching experience. In order to effectively assess the course design project, as well as provide essential feedback to our stakeholders, the ILC developed and administered a survey about the co-design experience. This survey was conducted among twenty-six participants from eleven different liberal arts institutions outside the United States that are all members of the AMICAL Consortium (appendix 2A). The survey participants came from diverse countries: Lebanon, Armenia, the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Kuwait, Italy, Switzerland, Kyrgyzstan, Bulgaria, Kosovo, and France. It is interesting to see how the teaching experience and the idea of liberal arts education unfolds within the local contexts of these different cultures as well as different disciplines. For instance, for a better understanding of classroom dynamics, aspects such as attitudes toward female teachers or methods used to teach history in different countries must be taken into account when analyzing responses.Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL)2021-01-28T04:29:05Z2021-01-28T04:29:05Z2020Published versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartapplication/pdfStöpel, M., Piotto, L., Furno, C., Spasov, K., & Zargaryan, T. (2020). Insights into faculty-librarian collaborations around the framework: Findings from the 2018 co-design survey. In Stöpel, M., Piotto, L., Goodman, X., & Godbey, S. (Eds.), Faculty-Librarian Collaborations: Integrating the Information Literacy Framework into Disciplinary Courses (pp. 21-34). Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL).9780838948538http://hdl.handle.net/11073/21286en_USoai:repository.aus.edu:11073/212862024-08-22T11:38:26Z
spellingShingle Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
Stöpel, Michael
status_str publishedVersion
title Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
title_full Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
title_fullStr Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
title_full_unstemmed Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
title_short Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
title_sort Insights into Faculty-Librarian Collaborations around the Framework Findings from the 2018 Co-design Survey
url http://hdl.handle.net/11073/21286