Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law

This study aimed to investigated and compare legal frameworks in Singapore and the UAE focusing on contractor payment rights, statutory protection, and mechanisms to ensure timely payment. A structured legal research methodology which incorporated doctrinal, non-doctrinal, and comparative approaches...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: ALOBAIDI, NOORULHUDA (author)
منشور في: 2025
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3343
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1862980614627524608
author ALOBAIDI, NOORULHUDA
author_facet ALOBAIDI, NOORULHUDA
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Dr Abba Kolo
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv ALOBAIDI, NOORULHUDA
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-09-08T09:28:27Z
2025-03
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 22000746
https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3343
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv The British University in Dubai (BUiD)
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv contractor payments
legal frameworks
statutory protections
Security of Payment Act (SOPA)
UAE civil transactions law
dispute resolution mechanisms
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Dissertation
description This study aimed to investigated and compare legal frameworks in Singapore and the UAE focusing on contractor payment rights, statutory protection, and mechanisms to ensure timely payment. A structured legal research methodology which incorporated doctrinal, non-doctrinal, and comparative approaches was employed to analyse contractor payment rights in Singapore and the UAE. Singapore’s system, driven by the Security of Payment Act (SOPA), the SOPA offers robust statutory protections that ensure contractors’ rights to progress payments and have access to adjudication, effectively mitigating payment delays and disputes. In contrast, the UAE relies on broader principles of good faith under the UAE Civil Transactions Law and provisions of standard forms of contract such as FIDIC and Dubai Municipality contracts. Even though UAE’s frameworks provide structured payment terms, they lack the efficiency and enforceability of Singapore’s statutory approach. Dispute resolution mechanisms also differ, with Singapore’s adjudication offering cost-effective and timely solutions, whereas the UAE's reliance on arbitration can be time-consuming and expensive. It could be argued that UAE could benefit from improvements such as the introduction of a statutory framework akin to SOPA to enhance contractor protection and improve efficiency. In both jurisdictions, further advancements such as the use of digital tools for claims processing and additional safeguards for subcontractors could strengthen the existing system.
id budr_27287aba8de2b42b03a1cbfa048c747d
identifier_str_mv 22000746
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str budr
network_name_str The British University in Dubai repository
oai_identifier_str oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/3343
publishDate 2025
publisher.none.fl_str_mv The British University in Dubai (BUiD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore LawALOBAIDI, NOORULHUDAcontractor paymentslegal frameworksstatutory protectionsSecurity of Payment Act (SOPA)UAE civil transactions lawdispute resolution mechanismsThis study aimed to investigated and compare legal frameworks in Singapore and the UAE focusing on contractor payment rights, statutory protection, and mechanisms to ensure timely payment. A structured legal research methodology which incorporated doctrinal, non-doctrinal, and comparative approaches was employed to analyse contractor payment rights in Singapore and the UAE. Singapore’s system, driven by the Security of Payment Act (SOPA), the SOPA offers robust statutory protections that ensure contractors’ rights to progress payments and have access to adjudication, effectively mitigating payment delays and disputes. In contrast, the UAE relies on broader principles of good faith under the UAE Civil Transactions Law and provisions of standard forms of contract such as FIDIC and Dubai Municipality contracts. Even though UAE’s frameworks provide structured payment terms, they lack the efficiency and enforceability of Singapore’s statutory approach. Dispute resolution mechanisms also differ, with Singapore’s adjudication offering cost-effective and timely solutions, whereas the UAE's reliance on arbitration can be time-consuming and expensive. It could be argued that UAE could benefit from improvements such as the introduction of a statutory framework akin to SOPA to enhance contractor protection and improve efficiency. In both jurisdictions, further advancements such as the use of digital tools for claims processing and additional safeguards for subcontractors could strengthen the existing system.The British University in Dubai (BUiD)Dr Abba Kolo2025-09-08T09:28:27Z2025-03Dissertationapplication/pdf22000746https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3343enoai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/33432025-09-08T09:37:14Z
spellingShingle Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
ALOBAIDI, NOORULHUDA
contractor payments
legal frameworks
statutory protections
Security of Payment Act (SOPA)
UAE civil transactions law
dispute resolution mechanisms
title Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
title_full Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
title_fullStr Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
title_full_unstemmed Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
title_short Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
title_sort Contractor Entitlement To Payments Under UAE And Singapore Law
topic contractor payments
legal frameworks
statutory protections
Security of Payment Act (SOPA)
UAE civil transactions law
dispute resolution mechanisms
url https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3343