Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality
This mixed-methods study investigated the use of lexical cohesive devices (LCD) for 56 Arab English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in the UAE. The quantitative descriptive approach was used to find out the frequency of LCD in learners’ essays, and the quantitative correlational approach was im...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | |
| منشور في: |
2017
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2887 https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v14i.9534. |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| _version_ | 1862980616418492416 |
|---|---|
| author | Khalil, Abdelhamid A. |
| author2 | Abu-Ayyash, Emad A.S |
| author2_role | author |
| author_facet | Khalil, Abdelhamid A. Abu-Ayyash, Emad A.S |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Khalil, Abdelhamid A. Abu-Ayyash, Emad A.S |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2017 2025-04-14T14:50:12Z 2025-04-14T14:50:12Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | Khalil, A.A. and Abu-Ayyash, E.A.S. (2023) “Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality,” JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN LINGUISTICS, 14, pp. 7–19. 2348-3024 https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2887 https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v14i.9534. |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en_US |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | https://rajpub.com/index.php/jal |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN LINGUISTICSv14 (20231005): 7-19 |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | lexical cohesive devices, L2 learners, cohesive devices, essay writing |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Article |
| description | This mixed-methods study investigated the use of lexical cohesive devices (LCD) for 56 Arab English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in the UAE. The quantitative descriptive approach was used to find out the frequency of LCD in learners’ essays, and the quantitative correlational approach was implemented to examine the association between LCD and the writing quality. However, the qualitative descriptive approach utilized semi-structured interviews of 4 EFL teachers and 15 EFL learners to identify the challenges that they encountered regarding using LCD in essay writing. The findings demonstrated that repetition and collocations were the most frequently used LCD, while meronyms and hyponyms were the least common in participants’ essays. There was also a moderate positive correlation between cohesive density and the writing quality. The difficulties reported by the participants in dealing with LCD included themes pertaining to awareness and instruction, de-contextualization of cohesive devices (CDs) and feedback and correction. |
| id | budr_2e41ea6daee7699be482ff1d2ce23894 |
| identifier_str_mv | Khalil, A.A. and Abu-Ayyash, E.A.S. (2023) “Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality,” JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN LINGUISTICS, 14, pp. 7–19. 2348-3024 |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en_US |
| network_acronym_str | budr |
| network_name_str | The British University in Dubai repository |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/2887 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | https://rajpub.com/index.php/jal |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing QualityKhalil, Abdelhamid A.Abu-Ayyash, Emad A.Slexical cohesive devices, L2 learners, cohesive devices, essay writingThis mixed-methods study investigated the use of lexical cohesive devices (LCD) for 56 Arab English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in the UAE. The quantitative descriptive approach was used to find out the frequency of LCD in learners’ essays, and the quantitative correlational approach was implemented to examine the association between LCD and the writing quality. However, the qualitative descriptive approach utilized semi-structured interviews of 4 EFL teachers and 15 EFL learners to identify the challenges that they encountered regarding using LCD in essay writing. The findings demonstrated that repetition and collocations were the most frequently used LCD, while meronyms and hyponyms were the least common in participants’ essays. There was also a moderate positive correlation between cohesive density and the writing quality. The difficulties reported by the participants in dealing with LCD included themes pertaining to awareness and instruction, de-contextualization of cohesive devices (CDs) and feedback and correction.https://rajpub.com/index.php/jal2025-04-14T14:50:12Z2025-04-14T14:50:12Z2017ArticleKhalil, A.A. and Abu-Ayyash, E.A.S. (2023) “Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality,” JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN LINGUISTICS, 14, pp. 7–19.2348-3024https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2887https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v14i.9534.en_USJOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN LINGUISTICSv14 (20231005): 7-19oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/28872026-01-29T17:03:09Z |
| spellingShingle | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality Khalil, Abdelhamid A. lexical cohesive devices, L2 learners, cohesive devices, essay writing |
| title | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality |
| title_full | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality |
| title_fullStr | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality |
| title_full_unstemmed | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality |
| title_short | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality |
| title_sort | Lexical Cohesive Devices and English Writing Quality |
| topic | lexical cohesive devices, L2 learners, cohesive devices, essay writing |
| url | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2887 https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v14i.9534. |