MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers
We are witnessing a continuous growth in the size of scien tific communities and the number of scientific publications. This phenomenon requires a continuous effort for ensuring the quality of publications and a healthy scientific evalu ation process. Peer reviewing is the de facto mechanism to asse...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Online Access: | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2925 https://openproceedings.org/2019/conf/edbt/EDBT19_paper_210.pdf https://doi.org/10.5441/002/edbt.2019.50 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1862980615402422272 |
|---|---|
| author | R. Moawad, Mohamed |
| author2 | Maher, Mohamed Awad, Ahmed Sakr, Sherif |
| author2_role | author author author |
| author_facet | R. Moawad, Mohamed Maher, Mohamed Awad, Ahmed Sakr, Sherif |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | R. Moawad, Mohamed Maher, Mohamed Awad, Ahmed Sakr, Sherif |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2019 2025-05-06T08:32:50Z 2025-05-06T08:32:50Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | Moawad M.R. et al. (2019) “Minaret: A recommendation framework for scientific reviewers,” Advances in Database Technology - EDBT, 2019-March, pp. 538–541. 2367-2005 https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2925 https://openproceedings.org/2019/conf/edbt/EDBT19_paper_210.pdf https://doi.org/10.5441/002/edbt.2019.50 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Open proceedings org |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | 22nd International Conference on Extending Database Technology, EDBT 2019 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Conference paper |
| description | We are witnessing a continuous growth in the size of scien tific communities and the number of scientific publications. This phenomenon requires a continuous effort for ensuring the quality of publications and a healthy scientific evalu ation process. Peer reviewing is the de facto mechanism to assess the quality of scientific work. For journal editors, managing an efficient and effective manuscript peer review process is not a straightforward task. In particular, a main component in the journal editors’ role is, for each submit ted manuscript, to ensure selecting adequate reviewers who need to be: 1) Matching on their research interests with the topic of the submission, 2) Fair in their evaluation of the submission, i.e., no conflict of interest with the authors, 3) Qualified in terms of various aspects including scientific impact, previous review/authorship experience for the jour nal, quality of the reviews, etc. Thus, manually selecting and assessing the adequate reviewers is becoming tedious and time consuming task. We demonstrate MINARET, a recommendation framework for selecting scientific reviewers. The framework facilitates the job of journal editors for conducting an efficient and effective scientific review process. The framework exploits the valuable information available on the modern scholarly Websites (e.g., Google Scholar, ACM DL, DBLP, Publons) for identifying candidate reviewers relevant to the topic of the manuscript, filtering them (e.g. excluding those with potential conflict of interest), and ranking them based on several metrics configured by the editor (user). The framework extracts the required information for the rec ommendation process from the online resources on-the-fly which ensures the output recommendations to be dynamic and based on up-to-date information. |
| id | budr_3009cdb8c1ad25c3f00ca2fc5addd556 |
| identifier_str_mv | Moawad M.R. et al. (2019) “Minaret: A recommendation framework for scientific reviewers,” Advances in Database Technology - EDBT, 2019-March, pp. 538–541. 2367-2005 |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en |
| network_acronym_str | budr |
| network_name_str | The British University in Dubai repository |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/2925 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Open proceedings org |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific ReviewersR. Moawad, MohamedMaher, MohamedAwad, AhmedSakr, SherifWe are witnessing a continuous growth in the size of scien tific communities and the number of scientific publications. This phenomenon requires a continuous effort for ensuring the quality of publications and a healthy scientific evalu ation process. Peer reviewing is the de facto mechanism to assess the quality of scientific work. For journal editors, managing an efficient and effective manuscript peer review process is not a straightforward task. In particular, a main component in the journal editors’ role is, for each submit ted manuscript, to ensure selecting adequate reviewers who need to be: 1) Matching on their research interests with the topic of the submission, 2) Fair in their evaluation of the submission, i.e., no conflict of interest with the authors, 3) Qualified in terms of various aspects including scientific impact, previous review/authorship experience for the jour nal, quality of the reviews, etc. Thus, manually selecting and assessing the adequate reviewers is becoming tedious and time consuming task. We demonstrate MINARET, a recommendation framework for selecting scientific reviewers. The framework facilitates the job of journal editors for conducting an efficient and effective scientific review process. The framework exploits the valuable information available on the modern scholarly Websites (e.g., Google Scholar, ACM DL, DBLP, Publons) for identifying candidate reviewers relevant to the topic of the manuscript, filtering them (e.g. excluding those with potential conflict of interest), and ranking them based on several metrics configured by the editor (user). The framework extracts the required information for the rec ommendation process from the online resources on-the-fly which ensures the output recommendations to be dynamic and based on up-to-date information.Open proceedings org2025-05-06T08:32:50Z2025-05-06T08:32:50Z2019Conference paperMoawad M.R. et al. (2019) “Minaret: A recommendation framework for scientific reviewers,” Advances in Database Technology - EDBT, 2019-March, pp. 538–541.2367-2005https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2925https://openproceedings.org/2019/conf/edbt/EDBT19_paper_210.pdfhttps://doi.org/10.5441/002/edbt.2019.50en22nd International Conference on Extending Database Technology, EDBT 2019 oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/29252025-06-13T11:31:03Z |
| spellingShingle | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers R. Moawad, Mohamed |
| title | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers |
| title_full | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers |
| title_fullStr | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers |
| title_full_unstemmed | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers |
| title_short | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers |
| title_sort | MINARET: A Recommendation Framework for Scientific Reviewers |
| url | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2925 https://openproceedings.org/2019/conf/edbt/EDBT19_paper_210.pdf https://doi.org/10.5441/002/edbt.2019.50 |