Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?

In many construction projects, standard forms of contract are an essential part of the contractual documents. They are preferred by construction parties for the advantages they present including reducing drafting time and costs. The International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) and the Ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hisham Alhyari, Omar (author)
Other Authors: Rabee Al Ani, Abdullah (author)
Published: 2022
Online Access:https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3553
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1862980613934415872
author Hisham Alhyari, Omar
author2 Rabee Al Ani, Abdullah
author2_role author
author_facet Hisham Alhyari, Omar
Rabee Al Ani, Abdullah
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hisham Alhyari, Omar
Rabee Al Ani, Abdullah
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2026-01-22T07:59:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3553
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en_US
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
description In many construction projects, standard forms of contract are an essential part of the contractual documents. They are preferred by construction parties for the advantages they present including reducing drafting time and costs. The International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) and the New Engineering Contract (NEC) forms prepared by the London Institution of Civil Engineers are among the most popular standard construction contracts. In comparison with the other FIDIC contracts, the Conditions of Contract for Construction (the Red Book) is most used, and within the NEC forms, the Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) is the most frequently used form. Both the Red Book and the ECC have their roots in common law jurisdictions. However, the former contract is widespread in civil law countries, whereas the latter is not. Several possible reasons for this difference can be studied. This paper is devoted to investigating whether the provisions of the ECC are less compatible than the provisions of the Red Book with the relevant mandatory statutory provisions and judicial jurisprudence of the United Arab Emirates, the civil code of which shares many similarities with the respective codes of other civil law countries. The investigation is instituted on the doctrinal research method and the results, which are documented in this paper, show that the ECC does not contain more contradictions than the Red Book with the aforementioned mandatory statutory provisions and judicial jurisprudence. Accordingly, it would appear that such contradictions do not explain why the ECC is not prevalent in civil law countries.
id budr_431df56ccd6010dbb9c665fdc459fcd1
language_invalid_str_mv en_US
network_acronym_str budr
network_name_str The British University in Dubai repository
oai_identifier_str oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/3553
publishDate 2022
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?Hisham Alhyari, OmarRabee Al Ani, AbdullahIn many construction projects, standard forms of contract are an essential part of the contractual documents. They are preferred by construction parties for the advantages they present including reducing drafting time and costs. The International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) and the New Engineering Contract (NEC) forms prepared by the London Institution of Civil Engineers are among the most popular standard construction contracts. In comparison with the other FIDIC contracts, the Conditions of Contract for Construction (the Red Book) is most used, and within the NEC forms, the Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) is the most frequently used form. Both the Red Book and the ECC have their roots in common law jurisdictions. However, the former contract is widespread in civil law countries, whereas the latter is not. Several possible reasons for this difference can be studied. This paper is devoted to investigating whether the provisions of the ECC are less compatible than the provisions of the Red Book with the relevant mandatory statutory provisions and judicial jurisprudence of the United Arab Emirates, the civil code of which shares many similarities with the respective codes of other civil law countries. The investigation is instituted on the doctrinal research method and the results, which are documented in this paper, show that the ECC does not contain more contradictions than the Red Book with the aforementioned mandatory statutory provisions and judicial jurisprudence. Accordingly, it would appear that such contradictions do not explain why the ECC is not prevalent in civil law countries.2026-01-22T07:59:00Z2022Articlehttps://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3553en_USoai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/35532026-01-29T17:09:15Z
spellingShingle Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
Hisham Alhyari, Omar
title Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
title_full Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
title_fullStr Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
title_short Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
title_sort Is the Engineering and Construction Contract Legally Less Competitive than the Red Book in Civil Law Countries?
url https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3553