TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT?
Despite the evolving nature of the global economy and the role of the state from the "nation-states" (Westphalia) into "market-states" with emphasis on privatization of hitherto state activities and competitive markets, which entail more external disciplines on state power especi...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| منشور في: |
2009
|
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3189 https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sujtnlr32&div=25&id=&page= |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| _version_ | 1862980619523325952 |
|---|---|
| author | Kolo, Abba |
| author_facet | Kolo, Abba |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Kolo, Abba |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2009-03-01 2025-06-10T11:53:31Z 2025-06-10T11:53:31Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | Kolo, A. (2009) “Tax ``Veto″ as a Special Jurisdictional and Substantive Issue In Investor-State Arbitration: Need for Reassessment?,” Suffolk transnational law review., 32(2), pp. 475–492. 1072-8546 https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3189 https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sujtnlr32&div=25&id=&page= |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en_US |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Hein Online |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | Suffolk transnational law review.32, no. 2, (2009): 475-492 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Article |
| description | Despite the evolving nature of the global economy and the role of the state from the "nation-states" (Westphalia) into "market-states" with emphasis on privatization of hitherto state activities and competitive markets, which entail more external disciplines on state power especially in the areas of trade, invest- ment, and human rights,1 most governments still viewed taxa- tion as a central element of sovereignty and so are reluctant to accept extensive or heightened international disciplines on their taxing powers.2 |
| id | budr_6fccfdf52a7cb8094183ffa18065a1a4 |
| identifier_str_mv | Kolo, A. (2009) “Tax ``Veto″ as a Special Jurisdictional and Substantive Issue In Investor-State Arbitration: Need for Reassessment?,” Suffolk transnational law review., 32(2), pp. 475–492. 1072-8546 |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en_US |
| network_acronym_str | budr |
| network_name_str | The British University in Dubai repository |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/3189 |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Hein Online |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT?Kolo, AbbaDespite the evolving nature of the global economy and the role of the state from the "nation-states" (Westphalia) into "market-states" with emphasis on privatization of hitherto state activities and competitive markets, which entail more external disciplines on state power especially in the areas of trade, invest- ment, and human rights,1 most governments still viewed taxa- tion as a central element of sovereignty and so are reluctant to accept extensive or heightened international disciplines on their taxing powers.2Hein Online2025-06-10T11:53:31Z2025-06-10T11:53:31Z2009-03-01ArticleKolo, A. (2009) “Tax ``Veto″ as a Special Jurisdictional and Substantive Issue In Investor-State Arbitration: Need for Reassessment?,” Suffolk transnational law review., 32(2), pp. 475–492.1072-8546https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3189https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sujtnlr32&div=25&id=&page=en_USSuffolk transnational law review.32, no. 2, (2009): 475-492oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/31892025-08-13T06:59:50Z |
| spellingShingle | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? Kolo, Abba |
| title | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? |
| title_full | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? |
| title_fullStr | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? |
| title_full_unstemmed | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? |
| title_short | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? |
| title_sort | TAX "VETO" AS A SPECIAL JURISDICTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: NEED FOR REASSESSMENT? |
| url | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3189 https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sujtnlr32&div=25&id=&page= |