Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot

—The present mixed-methods study investigated the readiness of teachers and adult learners at a vocational centre in the United Arab Emirates to implement a negotiated English syllabus. The study addressed two main questions: 1) are teachers and learners at the Vocational Training Centre ready to im...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S. (author)
منشور في: 2021
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2891
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00046.abu.
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1862980620636913664
author Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S.
author_facet Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S.
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S.
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2025-04-14T15:06:38Z
2025-04-14T15:06:38Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv Abu-Ayyash, E.A. S. (2021) “Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky’s soliloquy in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot,” English Text Construction, 14(2), pp. 182–202.
1874-8767
https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2891
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00046.abu.
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en_US
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Benjamins Publishing Company
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv English Text Construction, Volume 14, Issue 2, Dec 2021, p. 182 - 202
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv coherence; cohesion; cohesive devices; strategic coherence; Waiting for Godot
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
description —The present mixed-methods study investigated the readiness of teachers and adult learners at a vocational centre in the United Arab Emirates to implement a negotiated English syllabus. The study addressed two main questions: 1) are teachers and learners at the Vocational Training Centre ready to implement a negotiated syllabus? And 2) does the negotiated syllabus implementation lead to improvement in learners’ motivation? Results showed the significant potential of a negotiated syllabus in enhancing learners’ motivation by making them part of the decision-makers’ circle regarding the components of an intended English syllabus. On the other hand, learners, teachers and management systems face challenges that must first be overcome to succeed in implementing negotiated syllabi. The findings of this study support the value of involving learners in classroom decisions, which is expected to make them feel responsible for their learning.
id budr_a7f275e40cdedc8769ae9cb115db9e94
identifier_str_mv Abu-Ayyash, E.A. S. (2021) “Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky’s soliloquy in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot,” English Text Construction, 14(2), pp. 182–202.
1874-8767
language_invalid_str_mv en_US
network_acronym_str budr
network_name_str The British University in Dubai repository
oai_identifier_str oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/2891
publishDate 2021
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Benjamins Publishing Company
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for GodotAbu-Ayyash, Emad A. S.coherence; cohesion; cohesive devices; strategic coherence; Waiting for Godot—The present mixed-methods study investigated the readiness of teachers and adult learners at a vocational centre in the United Arab Emirates to implement a negotiated English syllabus. The study addressed two main questions: 1) are teachers and learners at the Vocational Training Centre ready to implement a negotiated syllabus? And 2) does the negotiated syllabus implementation lead to improvement in learners’ motivation? Results showed the significant potential of a negotiated syllabus in enhancing learners’ motivation by making them part of the decision-makers’ circle regarding the components of an intended English syllabus. On the other hand, learners, teachers and management systems face challenges that must first be overcome to succeed in implementing negotiated syllabi. The findings of this study support the value of involving learners in classroom decisions, which is expected to make them feel responsible for their learning.John Benjamins Publishing Company2025-04-14T15:06:38Z2025-04-14T15:06:38Z2021ArticleAbu-Ayyash, E.A. S. (2021) “Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky’s soliloquy in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot,” English Text Construction, 14(2), pp. 182–202.1874-8767https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2891https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00046.abu.en_USEnglish Text Construction, Volume 14, Issue 2, Dec 2021, p. 182 - 202oai:bspace.buid.ac.ae:1234/28912026-01-29T15:55:23Z
spellingShingle Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S.
coherence; cohesion; cohesive devices; strategic coherence; Waiting for Godot
title Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
title_full Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
title_fullStr Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
title_full_unstemmed Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
title_short Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
title_sort Non-coherent cohesive texts Lucky's soliloquy in Beckett's Waiting for Godot
topic coherence; cohesion; cohesive devices; strategic coherence; Waiting for Godot
url https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2891
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00046.abu.