A Comparative study of DAB and Arbitration as methods of resolving Construction Disputes
This dissertation’s purpose is to briefly introduce reasons for construction field disputes and to discuss the various DR methods applicable to resolve them, and their advantages and disadvantages. It then proceeds to elaborate on two of these methods, namely arbitration and dispute adjudication boa...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | AL KHAWAJA, DANA JAMAL (author) |
|---|---|
| منشور في: |
2023
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/2202 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Enforceability of DAB's Decision in the Context of the Construction Contract: A Comparison between English & UAE Law
حسب: SUKAR, EYAD
منشور في: (2023) -
Construction Disputes in the UAE: Causes and Resolution Methods
حسب: El-Sayegh, Sameh
منشور في: (2020) -
THE ROLE OF NATIONAL COURTS IN ARBITRATION: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ATTITUDE OF UGANDAN COURTS
حسب: OCEN, MILTON FRED
منشور في: (2019) -
FIDIC 1999 (Red Book) Dispute Adjudication Board’s: The UAE Construction Industry Perspective
حسب: BRUEN, DARREN
منشور في: (2018) -
Resolving Disputes related to Tendering for Engineering and Construction Contracts in the UAE: A Comparison with Tendering Disputes under English Law
حسب: JAFAR, MUQDAD JAWAD
منشور في: (2024)