Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
Assessment of internal validity safeguards implemented by researchers has been used to examine the potential reliability of evidence generated within a study. These safeguards protect against systematic error, and such an assessment has traditionally been called a quality assessment. When the result...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Format: | article |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435620311380 http://hdl.handle.net/10576/17298 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1857415083644157952 |
|---|---|
| author | Furuya-Kanamori, Luis |
| author2 | Xu, Chang Hasan, Syed Shahzad Doi, Suhail A. |
| author2_role | author author author |
| author_facet | Furuya-Kanamori, Luis Xu, Chang Hasan, Syed Shahzad Doi, Suhail A. |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Furuya-Kanamori, Luis Xu, Chang Hasan, Syed Shahzad Doi, Suhail A. |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2021-01-13T05:30:02Z 2021-01-31 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044 Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan SS, Doi SA. Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044 0895-4356 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435620311380 http://hdl.handle.net/10576/17298 129 1878-5921 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Elsevier |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Bias assessment Risk of bias Quality assessment Internal validity systematic error |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| description | Assessment of internal validity safeguards implemented by researchers has been used to examine the potential reliability of evidence generated within a study. These safeguards protect against systematic error, and such an assessment has traditionally been called a quality assessment. When the results of a quality assessment are translated through some empirical construct to the potential risk of bias, this has been termed a risk of bias assessment. The latter has gained popularity and is commonly used interchangeably with the term quality assessment. This key concept paper clarifies the differences between these assessments and how they may be used and interpreted when assessing clinical evidence for internal validity. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | qu_14b8b1e32716cf0a16d596ada1913c01 |
| identifier_str_mv | Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan SS, Doi SA. Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044 0895-4356 129 1878-5921 |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en |
| network_acronym_str | qu |
| network_name_str | Qatar University repository |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/17298 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Elsevier |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| spelling | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical researchFuruya-Kanamori, LuisXu, ChangHasan, Syed ShahzadDoi, Suhail A.Bias assessmentRisk of biasQuality assessmentInternal validitysystematic errorAssessment of internal validity safeguards implemented by researchers has been used to examine the potential reliability of evidence generated within a study. These safeguards protect against systematic error, and such an assessment has traditionally been called a quality assessment. When the results of a quality assessment are translated through some empirical construct to the potential risk of bias, this has been termed a risk of bias assessment. The latter has gained popularity and is commonly used interchangeably with the term quality assessment. This key concept paper clarifies the differences between these assessments and how they may be used and interpreted when assessing clinical evidence for internal validity.Elsevier2021-01-13T05:30:02Z2021-01-31Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan SS, Doi SA. Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.0440895-4356https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435620311380http://hdl.handle.net/10576/172981291878-5921enhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/172982025-06-10T19:07:29Z |
| spellingShingle | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research Furuya-Kanamori, Luis Bias assessment Risk of bias Quality assessment Internal validity systematic error |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research |
| title_full | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research |
| title_fullStr | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research |
| title_short | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research |
| title_sort | Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research |
| topic | Bias assessment Risk of bias Quality assessment Internal validity systematic error |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435620311380 http://hdl.handle.net/10576/17298 |