The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial

Background Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers are a serious patient safety concern, associated with poor patient outcomes and high healthcare costs. They are also viewed as an indicator of nursing care quality. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle in prev...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Chaboyer, Wendy (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Bucknall, Tracey (author), Webster, Joan (author), McInnes, Elizabeth (author), Gillespie, Brigid M. (author), Banks, Merrilyn (author), Whitty, Jennifer A. (author), Thalib, Lukman (author), Roberts, Shelley (author), Tallott, Mandy (author), Cullum, Nicky (author), Wallis, Marianne (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2016
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.015
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748916301705
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/4851
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1857415084480921600
author Chaboyer, Wendy
author2 Bucknall, Tracey
Webster, Joan
McInnes, Elizabeth
Gillespie, Brigid M.
Banks, Merrilyn
Whitty, Jennifer A.
Thalib, Lukman
Roberts, Shelley
Tallott, Mandy
Cullum, Nicky
Wallis, Marianne
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Chaboyer, Wendy
Bucknall, Tracey
Webster, Joan
McInnes, Elizabeth
Gillespie, Brigid M.
Banks, Merrilyn
Whitty, Jennifer A.
Thalib, Lukman
Roberts, Shelley
Tallott, Mandy
Cullum, Nicky
Wallis, Marianne
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chaboyer, Wendy
Bucknall, Tracey
Webster, Joan
McInnes, Elizabeth
Gillespie, Brigid M.
Banks, Merrilyn
Whitty, Jennifer A.
Thalib, Lukman
Roberts, Shelley
Tallott, Mandy
Cullum, Nicky
Wallis, Marianne
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-10T06:50:47Z
2016-12
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.015
Wendy Chaboyer, Tracey Bucknall, Joan Webster, Elizabeth McInnes, Brigid M. Gillespie, Merrilyn Banks, Jennifer A. Whitty, Lukman Thalib, Shelley Roberts, Mandy Tallott, Nicky Cullum, Marianne Wallis, The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Volume 64, December 2016, Pages 63-71
00207489
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748916301705
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/4851
63-71
64
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier, Ltd
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Care bundle
Cluster randomised trial
Nursing
Nursing interventions
Patient indicators
Patient outcomes
Pressure ulcer
Pressure ulcer prevention
Outcomes potentially sensitive to nursing
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description Background Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers are a serious patient safety concern, associated with poor patient outcomes and high healthcare costs. They are also viewed as an indicator of nursing care quality. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle in preventing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among at risk patients. Design Pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Setting Eight tertiary referral hospitals with >200 beds each in three Australian states. Participants 1600 patients (200/hospital) were recruited. Patients were eligible if they were: ≥18 years old; at risk of pressure ulcer because of limited mobility; expected to stay in hospital ≥48h and able to read English. Methods Hospitals (clusters) were stratified in two groups by recent pressure ulcer rates and randomised within strata to either a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle or standard care. The care bundle was theoretically and empirically based on patient participation and clinical practice guidelines. It was multi-component, with three messages for patients’ participation in pressure ulcer prevention care: keep moving; look after your skin; and eat a healthy diet. Training aids for patients included a DVD, brochure and poster. Nurses in intervention hospitals were trained in partnering with patients in their pressure ulcer prevention care. The statistician, recruiters, and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation and interventionists blinded to the study hypotheses, tested at both the cluster and patient level. The primary outcome, incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, which applied to both the cluster and individual participant level, was measured by daily skin inspection. Results Four clusters were randomised to each group and 799 patients per group analysed. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.035. After adjusting for clustering and pre-specified covariates (age, pressure ulcer present at baseline, body mass index, reason for admission, residence and number of comorbidities on admission), the hazard ratio for new pressure ulcers developed (pressure ulcer prevention care bundle relative to standard care) was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.33; p=0.198). No adverse events or harms were reported. Conclusions Although the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle was associated with a large reduction in the hazard of ulceration, there was a high degree of uncertainty around this estimate and the difference was not statistically significant. Possible explanations for this non-significant finding include that the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle was effective but the sample size too small to detect this.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id qu_460710509a18765ba326b47fb762cebc
identifier_str_mv Wendy Chaboyer, Tracey Bucknall, Joan Webster, Elizabeth McInnes, Brigid M. Gillespie, Merrilyn Banks, Jennifer A. Whitty, Lukman Thalib, Shelley Roberts, Mandy Tallott, Nicky Cullum, Marianne Wallis, The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Volume 64, December 2016, Pages 63-71
00207489
63-71
64
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str qu
network_name_str Qatar University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/4851
publishDate 2016
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier, Ltd
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spelling The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trialChaboyer, WendyBucknall, TraceyWebster, JoanMcInnes, ElizabethGillespie, Brigid M.Banks, MerrilynWhitty, Jennifer A.Thalib, LukmanRoberts, ShelleyTallott, MandyCullum, NickyWallis, MarianneCare bundleCluster randomised trialNursingNursing interventionsPatient indicatorsPatient outcomesPressure ulcerPressure ulcer preventionOutcomes potentially sensitive to nursingBackground Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers are a serious patient safety concern, associated with poor patient outcomes and high healthcare costs. They are also viewed as an indicator of nursing care quality. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle in preventing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among at risk patients. Design Pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Setting Eight tertiary referral hospitals with >200 beds each in three Australian states. Participants 1600 patients (200/hospital) were recruited. Patients were eligible if they were: ≥18 years old; at risk of pressure ulcer because of limited mobility; expected to stay in hospital ≥48h and able to read English. Methods Hospitals (clusters) were stratified in two groups by recent pressure ulcer rates and randomised within strata to either a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle or standard care. The care bundle was theoretically and empirically based on patient participation and clinical practice guidelines. It was multi-component, with three messages for patients’ participation in pressure ulcer prevention care: keep moving; look after your skin; and eat a healthy diet. Training aids for patients included a DVD, brochure and poster. Nurses in intervention hospitals were trained in partnering with patients in their pressure ulcer prevention care. The statistician, recruiters, and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation and interventionists blinded to the study hypotheses, tested at both the cluster and patient level. The primary outcome, incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, which applied to both the cluster and individual participant level, was measured by daily skin inspection. Results Four clusters were randomised to each group and 799 patients per group analysed. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.035. After adjusting for clustering and pre-specified covariates (age, pressure ulcer present at baseline, body mass index, reason for admission, residence and number of comorbidities on admission), the hazard ratio for new pressure ulcers developed (pressure ulcer prevention care bundle relative to standard care) was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.33; p=0.198). No adverse events or harms were reported. Conclusions Although the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle was associated with a large reduction in the hazard of ulceration, there was a high degree of uncertainty around this estimate and the difference was not statistically significant. Possible explanations for this non-significant finding include that the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle was effective but the sample size too small to detect this.National Health and Medical Research Council project grant number 1058963Elsevier, Ltd2016-10-10T06:50:47Z2016-12Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.015Wendy Chaboyer, Tracey Bucknall, Joan Webster, Elizabeth McInnes, Brigid M. Gillespie, Merrilyn Banks, Jennifer A. Whitty, Lukman Thalib, Shelley Roberts, Mandy Tallott, Nicky Cullum, Marianne Wallis, The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Volume 64, December 2016, Pages 63-7100207489http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748916301705http://hdl.handle.net/10576/485163-7164enhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/48512024-07-23T15:51:43Z
spellingShingle The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
Chaboyer, Wendy
Care bundle
Cluster randomised trial
Nursing
Nursing interventions
Patient indicators
Patient outcomes
Pressure ulcer
Pressure ulcer prevention
Outcomes potentially sensitive to nursing
status_str publishedVersion
title The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
title_full The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
title_fullStr The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
title_short The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
title_sort The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial
topic Care bundle
Cluster randomised trial
Nursing
Nursing interventions
Patient indicators
Patient outcomes
Pressure ulcer
Pressure ulcer prevention
Outcomes potentially sensitive to nursing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.015
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748916301705
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/4851