Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments

Despite the international efforts to improve pedestrian safety in different regions of the world, pedestrian fatalities still account for around one-third of annual road traffic deaths. Residential areas are commonly characterized by high pedestrian flows, making pedestrian safety a highpriority pub...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Qinaat, Hussain (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Alhajyaseen, Wael K.M. (author), Kharbeche, Mohamed (author), Almallah, Mustafa (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2022
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106908
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457522003438
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/41697
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1857415085070221312
author Qinaat, Hussain
author2 Alhajyaseen, Wael K.M.
Kharbeche, Mohamed
Almallah, Mustafa
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Qinaat, Hussain
Alhajyaseen, Wael K.M.
Kharbeche, Mohamed
Almallah, Mustafa
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Qinaat, Hussain
Alhajyaseen, Wael K.M.
Kharbeche, Mohamed
Almallah, Mustafa
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-07
2023-04-05T10:36:32Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106908
Hussain, Q., Alhajyaseen, W. K., Kharbeche, M., & Almallah, M. (2023). Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: comparison of innovative treatments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 180, 106908.
0001-4575
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457522003438
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/41697
180
1879-2057
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Vehicle
Pedestrian conflicts
Yielding rates
Crosswalks
Driving behavior
Pedestrian safety
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description Despite the international efforts to improve pedestrian safety in different regions of the world, pedestrian fatalities still account for around one-third of annual road traffic deaths. Residential areas are commonly characterized by high pedestrian flows, making pedestrian safety a highpriority public health issue. Different types of treatments such as ITS-based, road markings, and physical treatments have been implemented to improve pedestrian safety, however, their efficiency varies between different locations worldwide. Therefore, this study aims to compare different innovative crosswalk treatments and to investigate their impacts on driving behavior in residential areas using a driving simulator. In our study, we juxtapose five different types of treatments with the untreated control condition. The treatments included two ITS-based solutions [LED pavement lights (ITS_LED) and Variable Message Sign (ITS_VMS)]; two different road markings [yellow zigzag marking (Marking_zigzag) and white road narrowing marking with the word SLOW written in the middle (Marking_narrowing)] and a physical road narrowing treatment (Physical_narrowing). Each of the tested conditions (control condition and treatment conditions) was tested with a Yield/Stop-controlled marked crosswalk located in a residential area with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h for two different situations. In the first situation, there was no pedestrian at the crosswalk (Situation PA), while in the second situation, a pedestrian was present at the crosswalk (Situation PP). Sixty-one volunteers possessing a valid Qatari driving license participated in the experiment. The study results showed that compared to the control condition, Physical_narrowing, ITS_VMS, and Marking_narrowing conditions helped to improve the yielding rates by 12.7 %. In terms of drivers’ speed behavior, even though a pedestrian was not present at the crosswalk in Situation PA, physical_narrowing performed best by lowering the mean travel speed by around 10.1 km/h at the conflict location compared to the control location. Finally, the participants rated the physical_narrowing condition highest among the tested conditions. Based on the findings of the study, we conclude that the physical_narrowing treatment outperform other studied treatments since it significantly limits the freedom of drivers to maneuver, forcing them to slow down and give priority to crossing pedestrians.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id qu_c73f664c735b7595d5363ee40a6aa11b
identifier_str_mv Hussain, Q., Alhajyaseen, W. K., Kharbeche, M., & Almallah, M. (2023). Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: comparison of innovative treatments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 180, 106908.
0001-4575
180
1879-2057
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str qu
network_name_str Qatar University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/41697
publishDate 2022
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spelling Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatmentsQinaat, HussainAlhajyaseen, Wael K.M.Kharbeche, MohamedAlmallah, MustafaVehiclePedestrian conflictsYielding ratesCrosswalksDriving behaviorPedestrian safetyDespite the international efforts to improve pedestrian safety in different regions of the world, pedestrian fatalities still account for around one-third of annual road traffic deaths. Residential areas are commonly characterized by high pedestrian flows, making pedestrian safety a highpriority public health issue. Different types of treatments such as ITS-based, road markings, and physical treatments have been implemented to improve pedestrian safety, however, their efficiency varies between different locations worldwide. Therefore, this study aims to compare different innovative crosswalk treatments and to investigate their impacts on driving behavior in residential areas using a driving simulator. In our study, we juxtapose five different types of treatments with the untreated control condition. The treatments included two ITS-based solutions [LED pavement lights (ITS_LED) and Variable Message Sign (ITS_VMS)]; two different road markings [yellow zigzag marking (Marking_zigzag) and white road narrowing marking with the word SLOW written in the middle (Marking_narrowing)] and a physical road narrowing treatment (Physical_narrowing). Each of the tested conditions (control condition and treatment conditions) was tested with a Yield/Stop-controlled marked crosswalk located in a residential area with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h for two different situations. In the first situation, there was no pedestrian at the crosswalk (Situation PA), while in the second situation, a pedestrian was present at the crosswalk (Situation PP). Sixty-one volunteers possessing a valid Qatari driving license participated in the experiment. The study results showed that compared to the control condition, Physical_narrowing, ITS_VMS, and Marking_narrowing conditions helped to improve the yielding rates by 12.7 %. In terms of drivers’ speed behavior, even though a pedestrian was not present at the crosswalk in Situation PA, physical_narrowing performed best by lowering the mean travel speed by around 10.1 km/h at the conflict location compared to the control location. Finally, the participants rated the physical_narrowing condition highest among the tested conditions. Based on the findings of the study, we conclude that the physical_narrowing treatment outperform other studied treatments since it significantly limits the freedom of drivers to maneuver, forcing them to slow down and give priority to crossing pedestrians.This publication was made possible by the UREP award [UREP25-031-2-017 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author[s]. Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.Elsevier2023-04-05T10:36:32Z2022-12-07Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106908Hussain, Q., Alhajyaseen, W. K., Kharbeche, M., & Almallah, M. (2023). Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: comparison of innovative treatments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 180, 106908.0001-4575https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457522003438http://hdl.handle.net/10576/416971801879-2057enhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/416972024-07-23T10:58:20Z
spellingShingle Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
Qinaat, Hussain
Vehicle
Pedestrian conflicts
Yielding rates
Crosswalks
Driving behavior
Pedestrian safety
status_str publishedVersion
title Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
title_full Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
title_fullStr Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
title_full_unstemmed Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
title_short Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
title_sort Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments
topic Vehicle
Pedestrian conflicts
Yielding rates
Crosswalks
Driving behavior
Pedestrian safety
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106908
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457522003438
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/41697