Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages

This article defends three historical theses: (1) medieval sources remained a living material for early modern readers, although some selections were made; (2) early modern readers were eager not to repeat, but to expand the medieval doctrines; (3) a close historical study of early modern scholastic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schmutz, Jakob (author)
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12458/40
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1857415062317170688
author Schmutz, Jakob
author_facet Schmutz, Jakob
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Schmutz, Jakob
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
2018-10-21T12:44:38Z
2018-10-21T12:44:38Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 9780195379488
9780199968855
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12458/40
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195379488.013.0011
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Controlled Vocabulary for Resource Type Genres::text::book::book part
description This article defends three historical theses: (1) medieval sources remained a living material for early modern readers, although some selections were made; (2) early modern readers were eager not to repeat, but to expand the medieval doctrines; (3) a close historical study of early modern scholasticism can explain numerous and important features of contemporary philosophy, such as, for instance, the opposition between realism and idealism or even the famous "Continental-analytical" divide. It concludes that medieval philosophy had a paradoxical fate after the Middle Ages. Medieval philosophy's conceptual tools led not only the famous novatores, but also the more orthodox scholastics, to embrace new world views that are quite far from the medieval one. © 2012 by Oxford University Press Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
id sorbonner_1fea6061067dd227b50fa1863e24fd6e
identifier_str_mv 9780195379488
9780199968855
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195379488.013.0011
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str sorbonner
network_name_str Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi repository
oai_identifier_str oai:depot.sorbonne.ae:20.500.12458/40
publishDate 2012
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Medieval Philosophy after the Middle AgesSchmutz, JakobThis article defends three historical theses: (1) medieval sources remained a living material for early modern readers, although some selections were made; (2) early modern readers were eager not to repeat, but to expand the medieval doctrines; (3) a close historical study of early modern scholasticism can explain numerous and important features of contemporary philosophy, such as, for instance, the opposition between realism and idealism or even the famous "Continental-analytical" divide. It concludes that medieval philosophy had a paradoxical fate after the Middle Ages. Medieval philosophy's conceptual tools led not only the famous novatores, but also the more orthodox scholastics, to embrace new world views that are quite far from the medieval one. © 2012 by Oxford University Press Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved.Oxford University Press2018-10-21T12:44:38Z2018-10-21T12:44:38Z2012Controlled Vocabulary for Resource Type Genres::text::book::book part97801953794889780199968855http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12458/4010.1093/oxfordhb/9780195379488.013.0011enThe Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophyoai:depot.sorbonne.ae:20.500.12458/402023-12-05T07:21:33Z
spellingShingle Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
Schmutz, Jakob
title Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
title_full Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
title_fullStr Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
title_full_unstemmed Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
title_short Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
title_sort Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12458/40