Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach

This thesis delves into the intricate topic surrounding the defense of enforcing FAA on the public policy pretext, examining its impact with respect to the utilisation of arbitration in international commercial disputes. The discussion here compares how courts in chosen jurisdictions, namely UK, Ind...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Samuel, Silsy Rachel (author)
منشور في: 2023
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://depot.sorbonne.ae/handle/20.500.12458/1665
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
الوصف
الملخص:This thesis delves into the intricate topic surrounding the defense of enforcing FAA on the public policy pretext, examining its impact with respect to the utilisation of arbitration in international commercial disputes. The discussion here compares how courts in chosen jurisdictions, namely UK, India, France, and UAE, approach the public policy notion as an exemption to FAA enforcement. Additionally, I am also exploring the numerous facets of public policy influencing courts' interpretations and exploring the public policy execution within the perspective of the influential NYC.