Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach
This thesis delves into the intricate topic surrounding the defense of enforcing FAA on the public policy pretext, examining its impact with respect to the utilisation of arbitration in international commercial disputes. The discussion here compares how courts in chosen jurisdictions, namely UK, Ind...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Published: |
2023
|
| Online Access: | https://depot.sorbonne.ae/handle/20.500.12458/1665 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1857415064777129984 |
|---|---|
| author | Samuel, Silsy Rachel |
| author_facet | Samuel, Silsy Rachel |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Samuel, Silsy Rachel |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2023 2024-09-04T11:50:21Z 2024-09-04T11:50:21Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://depot.sorbonne.ae/handle/20.500.12458/1665 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Controlled Vocabulary for Resource Type Genres::text::thesis::master thesis |
| description | This thesis delves into the intricate topic surrounding the defense of enforcing FAA on the public policy pretext, examining its impact with respect to the utilisation of arbitration in international commercial disputes. The discussion here compares how courts in chosen jurisdictions, namely UK, India, France, and UAE, approach the public policy notion as an exemption to FAA enforcement. Additionally, I am also exploring the numerous facets of public policy influencing courts' interpretations and exploring the public policy execution within the perspective of the influential NYC. |
| id | sorbonner_ef9232f5b49361d94f53d52b29c4b527 |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en |
| network_acronym_str | sorbonner |
| network_name_str | Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi repository |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:depot.sorbonne.ae:20.500.12458/1665 |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approachSamuel, Silsy RachelThis thesis delves into the intricate topic surrounding the defense of enforcing FAA on the public policy pretext, examining its impact with respect to the utilisation of arbitration in international commercial disputes. The discussion here compares how courts in chosen jurisdictions, namely UK, India, France, and UAE, approach the public policy notion as an exemption to FAA enforcement. Additionally, I am also exploring the numerous facets of public policy influencing courts' interpretations and exploring the public policy execution within the perspective of the influential NYC.2024-09-04T11:50:21Z2024-09-04T11:50:21Z2023Controlled Vocabulary for Resource Type Genres::text::thesis::master thesishttps://depot.sorbonne.ae/handle/20.500.12458/1665enoai:depot.sorbonne.ae:20.500.12458/16652024-09-04T11:50:22Z |
| spellingShingle | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach Samuel, Silsy Rachel |
| title | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach |
| title_full | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach |
| title_fullStr | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach |
| title_full_unstemmed | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach |
| title_short | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach |
| title_sort | Public Policy and non-recognition of arbitral awards, a comparative approach |
| url | https://depot.sorbonne.ae/handle/20.500.12458/1665 |