Search alternatives:
"per decrease" » "per decreased" (Expand Search), "per increase" (Expand Search)
"mass decrease" » "mass decreased" (Expand Search), "mass increase" (Expand Search)
"users decrease" » "users decreased" (Expand Search), "users increase" (Expand Search)
"mean decrease" » "mean decreased" (Expand Search), "mean increase" (Expand Search)
"per decrease" » "per decreased" (Expand Search), "per increase" (Expand Search)
"mass decrease" » "mass decreased" (Expand Search), "mass increase" (Expand Search)
"users decrease" » "users decreased" (Expand Search), "users increase" (Expand Search)
"mean decrease" » "mean decreased" (Expand Search), "mean increase" (Expand Search)
-
1
Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Anthropometric and Cardiometabolic Improvements at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years—Are the Initial Benefits Sustained?
Published 2025“…Postoperatively, there was a significant and sustained weight reduction, amounting to a mean decrease of 9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in BMI at year 9 and associated excess weight loss between 59%<sub>year</sub> 1 and 46%<sub>year</sub> 9. …”
-
2
Exploring Beyond Numeric Weight Loss: The Metabolic Effects of Semaglutide.
Published 2025“…Studies have shown that semaglutide reduced fat mass, particularly visceral fat, while preserving lean muscle mass, as the proportion relative to total body mass decreased by 3.5% and 2.0% for total and visceral fat mass, respectively, while it increased by 3.0% for lean body mass. …”
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text
article -
3
Exploring beyond numeric weight loss: The metabolic effects of semaglutide
Published 2025“…Studies have shown that <u>semaglutide </u>reduced fat mass, particularly <u>visceral fat</u>, while preserving lean muscle mass, as the proportion relative to total body mass decreased by 3.5 % and 2.0 % for total and visceral fat mass, respectively, while it increased by 3.0 % for <u>lean body mass</u>. …”