Search alternatives:
a meta » _ meta (Expand Search)
decrease » decreased (Expand Search), increase (Expand Search)
a meta » _ meta (Expand Search)
decrease » decreased (Expand Search), increase (Expand Search)
-
1
Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Performance Adaptations to High-Intensity Interval Training: Are There Differences Between Men and Women? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses
Published 2023“…</p><h2>Results</h2><p dir="ltr">Thirty-three references from 28 trials were included in the review (n = 965; 462 women and 503 men). Meta-analyses included 19 studies for V̇ O<sub>2max</sub>, eight for peak power output from V̇ O<sub>2max</sub> testing (PPO), and five for threshold power (powerAT). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Published 2025“…</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">Six studies, five observational and one randomized (n = 553 patients, out of which 45.7% received advanced therapy), were included in our meta‐analysis. …”
-
5
Monitoring the Athlete Match Response: Can External Load Variables Predict Post-match Acute and Residual Fatigue in Soccer? A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
Published 2019“…For every 100-m run above 5.5 m·s<sup>−1</sup>, CK activity measured 24 h post-match increased by 30% and CMJPPO decreased by 0.5%. …”
-
6
Postmicturition dribble in men with no previous urogenital surgery: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of treatment modalities
Published 2023“…As the two physical/behavioral therapy studies used heterogenous outcome measures, narrative synthesis showed PMD volume improvement with PFMEs more than with urethral milking, both modalities were more effective than counseling, and in one study, PFMEs were effective in reducing PMD self‐reported complaint than counseling. Meta‐analyses of the two PDE5 inhibitors studies showed a large effect size with high heterogeneity for decreased PMD volume favoring PDE5 inhibitors over placebo (g = −0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.75; 0.02, p = 0.05; I2 = 88%); and a significant improvement equivalent to −1.06 points on the Hallym PMD Questionnaire score with no discernable heterogeneity (95% CI −1.65; −0.47, p = 0.0004; I2 = 0%), favoring PDE5 inhibitors compared to controls.…”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10