Explained variance ration of the PCA algorithm. by Abeer Aljohani (18497914)

“…These classification algorithms often requires conversion of a medical data to another space in which the original data is reduced to important values or moments. …”

ADT: A Generalized Algorithm and Program for Beyond Born–Oppenheimer Equations of “<i>N</i>” Dimensional Sub-Hilbert Space by Koushik Naskar (7510592)

“…In order to overcome such shortcoming, we develop a generalized algorithm, “ADT” to generate the nonadiabatic equations through symbolic manipulation and to construct highly accurate diabatic surfaces for molecular processes involving excited electronic states. …”

DataSheet1_Multi_Scale_Tools: A Python Library to Exploit Multi-Scale Whole Slide Images.PDF by Niccolò Marini (11247936)

“…<p>Algorithms proposed in computational pathology can allow to automatically analyze digitized tissue samples of histopathological images to help diagnosing diseases. …”

Image_1_KairoSight: Open-Source Software for the Analysis of Cardiac Optical Data Collected From Multiple Species.TIF by Blake L. Cooper (11622613)

“…Despite the refinement of software tools and algorithms, significant programming expertise is often required to analyze large optical data sets, and data analysis can be laborious and time-consuming. …”

S1 Graphical abstract - by José M. Rivera-Arbeláez (12418512)

“…However, existing optical tracking algorithms which focus on calculating the contractile force are customized and platform-specific, often not available to the broad research community, and thus hamper head-to-head comparison of the model output. …”

CSPP instance by peixiang wang (19499344)

“…</b></p><p dir="ltr">Its primary function is to create structured datasets that simulate container terminal operations, which can then be used for developing, testing, and benchmarking optimization algorithms (e.g., for yard stacking strategies, vessel stowage planning).…”

MCCN Case Study 2 - Spatial projection via modelled data by Donald Hobern (21435904)

“…</p><h4><b>Data sources</b></h4><ul><li><b>BradGinns_SOIL2004_SoilData.csv</b> - Soil measurements from the University of Sydney Llara Campey farm site from 2004, corresponding to sites L1, L3 and L4 describing mid-depth, soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa), GammaK, Clay, Silt, Sand, pH and soil electrical conductivity (EC)</li><li><b>Llara_Campey_field_boundaries_poly.shp</b> - Field boundary shapes for the University of Sydney Llara Campey farm site</li></ul><h4><b>Dependencies</b></h4><ul><li>This notebook requires Python 3.10 or higher</li><li>Install relevant Python libraries with: <b>pip install mccn-engine rocrate rioxarray pykrige</b></li><li>Installing mccn-engine will install other dependencies</li></ul><h4><b>Overview</b></h4><ol><li>Select soil sample measurements for pH or EC at 45 cm depth</li><li>Split sample measurements into 80% subset to model interpolated layers and 20% to test interpolated layers</li><li>Generate STAC metadata for layers</li><li>Load data cube</li><li>Interpolate pH and EC across site using the 80% subset and three different 2D interpolation methods from rioxarray (nearest, linear and cubic) and one from pykrige (linear)</li><li>Calculate the error between each layer of interpolated values and measured values for the 20% setaside for testing</li><li>Compare the mean and standard deviation of the errors for each interpolation method</li><li>Clean up and package results as RO-Crate</li></ol><h4><b>Notes</b></h4><ul><li>The granularity of variability in soil data significantly compromises all methods</li><li>Depending on the 80/20 split, different methods may appear more reliable, but the pykrige linear method is most often best</li></ul><p><br></p>…”