Showing 81 - 100 results of 152 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significantly ((less decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.58s Refine Results
  1. 81
  2. 82
  3. 83
  4. 84

    Minimal data set. by Daan P. van den Brink (9900073)

    Published 2025
    “…Other markers of endothelial injury or inflammation were not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were observed in histologic injury scores and wet-to-dry ratios.…”
  5. 85
  6. 86
  7. 87

    Prediction of transition readiness. by Sharon Barak (4803966)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>For individuals with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD and BMD, respectively), transitioning to adulthood presents significant challenges. Although considerable attention has been given to facilitating medical transitions due to the complexity of these conditions, less focus has been placed on other aspects of the transition, such as achieving independence. …”
  8. 88
  9. 89

    Histogram of the extracted parameters. by Qiuyu Du (20760848)

    Published 2025
    “…Logistic regression (n = 93) showed that a less steep contrast gradient (decreasing by 10 Hounsfield unit/%) was associated with a reduction in odds of the following short-term adverse outcomes: 48.1% for intensive care unit admission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.519, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.306–0.804), 29.3% for oxygen therapy >24 hours (OR = 0.707, 95% CI: 0.496–0.976), 60.6% for reperfusion therapy (OR = 0.394, 95% CI: 0.178–0.682), 57.5% for vasopressor therapy (OR = 0.425, 95% CI: 0.194–0.741), and 50.2% for PE-related death (OR = 0.498, 95% CI: 0.246–0.915). …”
  10. 90

    Supplementary file 1_Identifying early blood glucose trajectories in sepsis linked to distinct long-term outcomes: a K-means clustering study with external validation.docx by Huan Ma (713125)

    Published 2025
    “…Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a U-shaped association for mean glucose levels and a J-shaped relationship for GV linked to 1-year mortality risks, while an optimal glycemic range of 122 to 160 mg/dL and GV less than 0.18 indicated improved survival.…”
  11. 91
  12. 92
  13. 93
  14. 94
  15. 95
  16. 96
  17. 97
  18. 98
  19. 99
  20. 100