Search alternatives:
significant i » significance _ (Expand Search)
groups » group (Expand Search)
decrease » increase (Expand Search)
significant i » significance _ (Expand Search)
groups » group (Expand Search)
decrease » increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Decreased Interfacial Dynamics Caused by the N501Y Mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 S1 Spike:ACE2 Complex
Published 2022“…In this regard, the recent SARS-CoV-2 alpha, beta, and gamma variants (B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages, respectively) are of great significance in that they contain several mutations that increase their transmission rates as evident from clinical reports. …”
-
3
-
4
Effectiveness and specificity of a classroom-based group intervention in children and adolescents exposed to war in Lebanon
Published 2008“…The rates of disorders peaked one month post-war and decreased over one year. …”
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text
article -
5
-
6
-
7
Counter Revolutions via Extremists Groups. (c2016)
Published 2016“…The end of the year 2010 incorporated a highly significant set of events in the Middle East And North Africa (MENA) region. …”
Get full text
Get full text
masterThesis -
8
-
9
Effect of corporate ethics and social responsibility on OCB: the role of employee identification and perceived CSR significance
Published 2021“…Partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is used to analyze the data and multi-group analysis is conducted to investigate the role of perceived CSR significance. …”
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text
article -
10
Deletion of <i>RFX6</i> impairs iPSC-derived islet organoid development and survival, with no impact on PDX1<sup>+</sup>/NKX6.1<sup>+</sup> progenitors
Published 2024“…Single-cell analysis revealed high RFX6 expression levels in endocrine clusters across various hESC-derived pancreatic differentiation stages. Upon differentiating iPSCs lacking RFX6 into pancreatic islets, a significant decrease in PDX1 expression at the PF stage was observed, although this did not affect PPs co-expressing PDX1 and NKX6.1. …”
-
11
A slow but steady nanoLuc: R162A mutation results in a decreased, but stable, nanoLuc activity
Published 2024“…In this regard, engineering of brighter bioluminescent proteins, i.e. luciferases, has played a significant role. …”
-
12
The Impact of Cooperative Learning on Speaking Performance among University Foundation Programme Students
Published 2019“…The experimental group got exposed to instruction based on CL techniques while the control group was taught without being instructed to use the CL activities. …”
Get full text
-
13
-
14
STIM1 signals through NFAT1 independently of Orai1 and SOCE to regulate breast cancer cell migration
Published 2023“…Interestingly, NFAT1 is significantly downregulated in STIM1-KO cells and overexpression of NFAT1 reversed the enhanced migration of STIM1-KO cells. …”
-
15
Group Relative Deprivation and Violent Radicalism: Moving Toward a Comprehensive Model
Published 2025“…The results also confirm that group‐based contempt is uniquely predictive of support for violence, unlike group‐based anger. …”
-
16
Optimal Group Formation in Dense Wi-Fi Direct Networks for Content Distribution
Published 2019“…The results reveal significant performance gains in terms of group formation time and network throughput. …”
-
17
Notch Signaling Inhibition by LY411575 Attenuates Osteoblast Differentiation and Decreased Ectopic Bone Formation Capacity of Human Skeletal (Mesenchymal) Stem Cells
Published 2019“…Among the tested molecules, LY411575, a potent γ-secretase and Notch signaling inhibitor, exhibited significant inhibitory effects on osteoblastic differentiation of hBMSCs manifested by reduced ALP activity, mineralized matrix formation, and decreased osteoblast-specific gene expression as well as in vivo ectopic bone formation. …”
-
18
-
19
Predicting the Heats of Fusion of Ionic Liquids via Group Contribution Modeling and Machine Learning
Published 2022Get full text
doctoralThesis -
20
Sex differences in shoulder performance fatiguability are affected by arm position, dominance and muscle group
Published 2022“…</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">Muscle group was the only factor to display significant variation when not considering other factors, with higher values for C.Perf (mean difference = 353.59 J, <i>P </i>< 0.0005), BR (mean difference = 14.21 J, <i>P </i>< 0.0005) and IF (mean difference = 3.65%, <i>P </i> = 0.0046). …”