Showing 1 - 20 results of 7,485 for search '(( significant spatial decrease ) OR ( significantly better decrease ))', query time: 0.43s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Fig 7 - by Shuang Lu (504608)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Fig 8 - by Shuang Lu (504608)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
  14. 14

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
  15. 15

    Spatial variation of water availability in Hebi. by Shaolei Guo (3146259)

    Published 2024
    “…The results indicate that: (1) During the study period, the overall land use type in Hebi City has been constantly changing, with the most significant conversion from arable land to other land types; combined with its landscape pattern index, Hebi City has a general characteristic of significant landscape fragmentation and complexity in land use. (2) Habitat quality in Hebi shows an overall trend towards better development, with water availability decreasing and then increasing; the zoning of ecosystem services in Hebi is divided into three classes: superior, good and general, with the area covered by the superior and general classes expanding year by year. (3) Correlation analysis by SPSS software shows that the correlation between habitat quality and landscape pattern index is greater than the correlation between habitat quality and climate change. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20