Search alternatives:
sentiment classification » text classification (Expand Search), subject classification (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 11 results of 11 for search 'sentiment classification algorithm', query time: 0.05s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Intelligent Hybrid Feature Selection for Textual Sentiment Classification by Jawad Khan (6422669)

    Published 2021
    “…Finally, for textual sentiment classification, the well-known classification algorithms Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Generalized Linear Model (GLM) are trained in the ensemble model on the refined sentiment feature set. …”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Sentiment analysis for Arabizi in social media. (c2015) by Tobaili, Taha

    Published 2015
    “…One major challenge is applying sentiment analysis techniques onto other languages. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
    masterThesis
  6. 6

    Arabic Hotel Reviews Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Learning by ALMANSOORI, MOHAMMAD

    Published 2023
    “…Our models utilized advanced text preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification algorithms to accurately predict sentiment polarity in Arabic hotel reviews. …”
    Get full text
  7. 7

    Sentiment Analysis of the Emirati Dialect text using Ensemble Stacking Deep Learning Models by AL SHAMSI, ARWA AHMED

    Published 2023
    “…The study of thoughts, feelings, judgments, values, attitudes, and emotions regarding goods, services, organizations, persons, tasks, occasions, titles, and their attributes is known as sentiment analysis and it involves a polarity classification task for recognizing positive, negative, or neutral text to quantify what individuals believe using textual qualitative data. …”
    Get full text
  8. 8

    Cyberbullying Detection in Arabic Text using Deep Learning by ALBAYARI, REEM RAMADAN SA’ID

    Published 2023
    “…Therefore, this study aims to evaluate several versions of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Feedforward Neural Networks (FNNs) for detecting cyberbullying in the Arabic language. Although these algorithms are widely used in text classification and outperform the performance of classical classifiers, many have been extensively investigated in other domains such as sentiment analysis and dialect identification, as well as cyberbullying detection in English text. …”
    Get full text
  9. 9

    Detecting Arabic Cyberbullying Tweets in Arabic Social Using Deep Learning by ALFALASI, FARIS Jr

    Published 2023
    “…In this work, two cases of classification were adapted. The first case was 2-classes classification where the data labeled as either cyberbullying or not cyberbullying. …”
    Get full text
  10. 10

    Con-Detect: Detecting adversarially perturbed natural language inputs to deep classifiers through holistic analysis by Hassan, Ali

    Published 2023
    “…We experiment with multiple attackers—Text-bugger, Text-fooler, PWWS—on several architectures—MLP, CNN, LSTM, Hybrid CNN-RNN, BERT—trained for different classification tasks—IMDB sentiment classification, fake-news classification, AG news topic classification—under different threat models—Con-Detect-blind attacks, Con-Detect-aware attacks, and Con-Detect-adaptive attacks—and show that Con-Detect can reduce the attack success rate (ASR) of different attacks from 100% to as low as 0% for the best cases and ≈70% for the worst case. …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
    Get full text
    article
  11. 11

    Con-Detect: Detecting Adversarially Perturbed Natural Language Inputs to Deep Classifiers Through Holistic Analysis by Hassan Ali (3348749)

    Published 2023
    “…We experiment with multiple attackers—Text-bugger, Text-fooler, PWWS—on several architectures—MLP, CNN, LSTM, Hybrid CNN-RNN, BERT—trained for different classification tasks—IMDB sentiment classification, fake-news classification, AG news topic classification—under different threat models—Con-Detect-blind attacks, Con-Detect-aware attacks, and Con-Detect-adaptive attacks—and show that Con-Detect can reduce the attack success rate (ASR) of different attacks from 100% to as low as 0% for the best cases and ≈70% for the worst case. …”