-
1
Correlation between subjective depth (D) and normalized EVA (degrees).
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
2
The EVA as predicted by eye movement end depth and participant (data from Fig 4b).
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Predicting the vergence stability hypothesis (H3): reducing the maximal model to the fitted model.
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
7
-
8
(a) The visual stimulus was a Landolt C resolving to a fixation cross, resulting in a four-alternative forced choice visual discrimination task.
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
9
Analysis of Eq 2, the fitted model testing the effect of end depth (Hypothesis H1) and environment (Hypothesis H2) on EVA.
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
10
The geometry of the Eye Vergence Angle (EVA) while fixating on a near and far target.
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
11
Eye Vergence Angle (EVA) calculation and an example of unprocessed eye tracking data.
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
12
-
13
Predicting the natural log ratio of XR target depth over real target depth (Hypothesis H4): reducing the maximal model to the fitted model.
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
14
-
15
-
16
Analysis of Eq 3: the fitted model testing vergence stability (Hypothesis H3).
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe 2025Ábhair: -
17
-
18