Supplementary Results for Table 2 (b) and Fig 3. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Attack success rates (%) of adversarial attacks against six models. ^* indicates the white-box attacks. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Logarithm of loss and attack success rates (%) of Diff-AdaNAG, Diff-PGD, and PGD on various numbers of iterations. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Attack success rates (%) of adversarial attacks against twelve models. ^* indicates the white-box attacks. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Comparison of SI-NI-FGSM and SI+Ours. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Supplementary results for Table 3 (b). od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Visualization of adversarial samples. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Attack success rates (%) of adversarial attacks against twelve models. ^* indicates the white-box attacks. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Attack success rates (%) of adversarial attacks against twelve models. ^* indicates the white-box attacks. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Supplementary 4esults for Table 3 (a). od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Attack success rates (%) of adversarial attacks against twelve models. ^* indicates the white-box attacks. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Supplementary Results for Table 2 (a). od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Supplementary results for Table 3 (c). od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Our proposed Diff-AdaNAG framework. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Supplementary results for Table 4. od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme:

Supplementary Results for Table 2 (c). od Chen Lin (95910)

Teme: