Evaluating the robustness of GNNs compared to benchmarks (A) and their required training time (B). by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Comparing AUROC across several deep learning techniques for the classification of sepsis on complete blood count data (higher values represent better performance). We evaluated the... by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Comparing AUROC across Graph Neural Networks patient-centric graphs (directed, reversed directed and undirected) for the classification of sepsis on complete blood count data (high... by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Comparison of GNNs against benchmarks on complete blood count data for sepsis classification (higher values represent better performance) and their required training time. We evalu... by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Complete blood counts of a single patient by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Workflow of our study to evaluate the performance of GNNs compared to benchmark algorithms. by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Partial dependence plots (A – G) and the resulting clustered feature importance (H) for each feature and trained model. by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Comparing AUROC, exploited biases, use cases and issues of Graph Attention Networks on similarity and patient-centric graphs (directed, reversed directed and undirected) for the cl... by Daniel Walke (21680915)

Subjects:

Agreements and disagreements between scores obtained during items 18, 19 and 22 completion using the Paper-based support (P-score) or the Tablet (T-score). by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Bangdiwala’s agreement charts for item 18 (A), 19 (B) and 22 (C) comparing item scores between the Paper-based support and the Tablet. by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Agreements and disagreements between scores of the therapist’s score on the tablet (T-score) and the automatic score (A-score) from the TabMe2 software. by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Subject characteristics. by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Original paper-based support for item 18 (A), 19 (B) and 22 (C) and screenshots of the digital interfaces of the item 18 (D), 19 (E) and 22 (F). by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

List of meaningful comments reported by study subjects and therapists after item completion 18, 19 and 22. by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Assessment of the level of difficulty of the task from subjects (A) and therapists (B) when using the tablet compared to the paper-based support during the item 18, 19 and 22 compl... by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Research data. by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Percentage agreement and weighted Kappa coefficient between evaluation using the paper-based support or the tablet for item 18, 19 and 22. by Dominique Vincent-Genod (20552594)

Subjects:

Comparison of OCT-derived total skin thickness at baseline and at 7 months. Total skin thickness was measured using OCT at baseline and at 7 months to assess changes over time. The... by Anna V. Vejlsby (22033236)

Subjects:

Arbitrary Design of DNA-Programmable 3D Crystals through Symmetry Mapping by Jason S. Kahn (2744830)

Subjects:

Development of the skin thickness at the back, the side, and the stomach for the four groups: control group, UVR control, UVR + NMN, and UVR + PL. by Anna V. Vejlsby (22033236)

Subjects: