Search alternatives:
"auc values increased" » "auc cases increased" (Expand Search), "auc dalys increased" (Expand Search), "auc also increased" (Expand Search)
"ct values decrease" » "ct largest decrease" (Expand Search), "_ values decrease" (Expand Search), "i values decrease" (Expand Search)
"c large decrease" » "c larger decrease" (Expand Search), "c marked decrease" (Expand Search), "c large increases" (Expand Search), "_ large decrease" (Expand Search), "a large decrease" (Expand Search), "b large decrease" (Expand Search)
"auc values increased" » "auc cases increased" (Expand Search), "auc dalys increased" (Expand Search), "auc also increased" (Expand Search)
"ct values decrease" » "ct largest decrease" (Expand Search), "_ values decrease" (Expand Search), "i values decrease" (Expand Search)
"c large decrease" » "c larger decrease" (Expand Search), "c marked decrease" (Expand Search), "c large increases" (Expand Search), "_ large decrease" (Expand Search), "a large decrease" (Expand Search), "b large decrease" (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Identification results of four algorithms on test sets for different feature subsets.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Table 1_Assessing the diagnostic value of qPCR for Trichuris trichiura: sub-analysis of a multi-country clinical trial to determine the efficacy of albendazole compared to an alben...
Published 2025“…Concordance between stool egg counts and Ct-value decreased post-treatment, likely due to reduced KK sensitivity in low-intensity infections. …”
-
15
Data Sheet 1_The triglyceride glucose-body mass index predicts adverse reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing frozen embryo transfer.docx
Published 2025“…Combined with other identified risk factors, including basal luteinizing hormone, basal follicle stimulating hormone, total cholesterol, testosterone, infertility type and controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, the AUC value increased (AUC = 0.667, P < 0.001) and this model showed good miscarriage prediction performance in most subgroups (AUC > 0.650, P < 0.05), especially in patients with normal or low weight (BMI < 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, AUC = 0.743, P < 0.001).…”