Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
rate decreased » rate increased (Expand Search)
c larger » _ larger (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
c large » a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
_ rate » _ rats (Expand Search), _ rare (Expand Search), _ race (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
rate decreased » rate increased (Expand Search)
c larger » _ larger (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
c large » a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
_ rate » _ rats (Expand Search), _ rare (Expand Search), _ race (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
5
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
In superadditive networks, more enhancers decrease noise and fidelity.
Published 2023“…<p>(A) Superadditivity is implemented in our model by linearly increasing <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> rates and linearly decreasing <i>k</i><sub>off</sub> rates. …”
-
9
Performance of the response detection algorithm at detecting simulated increases versus decreases in firing rate.
Published 2020“…<p>Curves reflect the mean (±SD) fraction of increases and decreases detected as a function of the simulated response size (expressed as percent of baseline firing rate). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20