Search alternatives:
values increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
c marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marked (Expand Search), _ market (Expand Search)
n marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marked (Expand Search), _ market (Expand Search)
c values » ct values (Expand Search), _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
values increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
c marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marked (Expand Search), _ market (Expand Search)
n marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marked (Expand Search), _ market (Expand Search)
c values » ct values (Expand Search), _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Fig 3 -
Published 2024“…All the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey Pairwise Comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 3 rats for each group. …”
-
10
Restoration of normal division rates to <i>stat</i> mutant FSCs requires both excess G1/S and G2/M regulators.
Published 2023“…For each genotype, above the graph, the average number of marked FSCs at 12d is indicated (“FSC #”). The two values on the top line of the row labeled “Diff’n” are two additional parameters derived from each MARCM lineage analysis: the percentage of FSCs in layer 1 at 6d, followed by the average probability of a layer 1 FSC becoming an FC in a single 12h budding cycle. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Study group background characteristics.
Published 2024“…The <b><i>NSE</i></b> group sampling also reflected later recognition and attention to this clinical entity. <b>C</b>. <b>Age</b>. The ages of the subjects were not specifically selected and consequently also varied among groups, with group medians ranging from 39 to 50 years with largely similar ranges. …”