Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
rate decreased » rate increased (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
a larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
_ rate » _ rats (Expand Search), _ rare (Expand Search), _ race (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
rate decreased » rate increased (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
a larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
_ rate » _ rats (Expand Search), _ rare (Expand Search), _ race (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Variables for the bromeliad agent representing a single <i>T. utriculata</i> rosette.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Annual change rate of <i>FVC</i> in each analysis area.
Published 2024“…The Open-pit mining affected areas showed the largest decline, reaching 68.3%. The <i>FVC</i> in the underground mining areas had a downward trend, but self-healing effect after mining was also observed. (2) The overall <i>FVC</i> in the study area was positively correlated with the number of precipitation days. (3) There were differences in the sensitivity to mining disturbance for different landform in the underground mining areas. (4) Although the <i>FVC</i> in the Old mining areas had recovered to the level of Natural growth control area, but the annual fluctuation was larger, which might mean lower ecological stability.…”
-
19
-
20
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”