Search alternatives:
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
i means » _ means (Expand Search), k means (Expand Search)
i mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), b mean (Expand Search)
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
i means » _ means (Expand Search), k means (Expand Search)
i mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), b mean (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Effects of GJE extract treatment decreased expression of NF-kB p65.
Published 2025“…Data are expressed as mean ± SD, error bars indicate standard deviation, n = 6/group. a: when compared to the control group. b: when compared to the NF group, <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05 for both a and b.…”
-
7
-
8
Means scores of CAM and CAM-MYCS.
Published 2025“…A moderate negative correlation was observed between CAM and CAM-MYCS scores (r = −0.511; p < 0.001), indicating that increased awareness of real causes is associated with decreased belief in myths. …”
-
9
Evogliptin attenuates the phenotypic switch of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the osteogenesis-associated genes <i>in-vitro.</i>
Published 2025“…CER + P<sub>i</sub> group by One way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.…”
-
10
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20