Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
01 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 1 0 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
e nn » e non (Expand Search), _ nn (Expand Search), k nn (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
01 0 » 0 0 (Expand Search), 1 0 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
e nn » e non (Expand Search), _ nn (Expand Search), k nn (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.
Published 2023“…<p>Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.…”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
AKT inhibition decreases neuroblast populations.
Published 2012“…The data are shown as the mean±SEM and the statistical significance between the different conditions was estimated by Student's t-test: *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 versus control (0S). …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
At lower concentrations, METH decreases LTP.
Published 2010“…At 0.1 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.08 [<i>n</i> = 13(5)] (Fig. 1B); at 1 µM METH, LTP was 1.50±.07 [<i>n</i> = 13(7)] (Fig. 1C); at 10 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.07 [<i>n</i> = 14(8)] (Fig. 1D); at 30 µM METH, LTP was 1.37±.06 [<i>n</i> = 15(4)] (Fig. 1E); and at 60 µM METH, LTP was 1.32±.24 [<i>n</i> = 4(2)] (Fig. 1E). …”
-
19
-
20