Showing 1 - 20 results of 86,623 for search '(((( 01 1 decrease ) OR ( _ point decrease ))) OR ( 50 ((ms decrease) OR (_ decrease)) ))*', query time: 0.92s Refine Results
  1. 1

    DART-ID decreases missing datapoints across runs. by Albert Tian Chen (6900215)

    Published 2019
    “…Only peptides seen in >50% of experiments are included. (<b>b</b>) Decrease in missing data across all runs after applying DART-ID, for SCoPE-MS and the two bulk sets from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082#pcbi.1007082.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> at 1% FDR. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Decreased oscillatory flow decreases <i>klf2a</i> expression. by Julien Vermot (257990)

    Published 2009
    “…*<i>p</i><0.05; **<i>p</i><0.01, ANOVA. (M) Outline summarizing the experimental outcome of decreasing oscillatory flow by decreasing heart rate. …”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    SLE decreases risk for hormonal cancers. by Deborah K. Johnson (10001156)

    Published 2021
    “…(b) Prostate cancer incidence in male SLE cohort is significantly decreased by SLE status (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.089, 0.50, p = 0.0053).…”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    <i>roh</i> mutation results in Rh1 decrease. by Yu Huang (15093)

    Published 2015
    “…Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Western blotting showing decreased Rh1 levels in the <i>roh</i><sup><i>EY04039</i></sup> mutant (<i>ey-flp Rh1</i>::<i>GFP; FRT42D roh</i><sup><i>EY04039</i></sup><i>/ FRT42D GMR-hid CL</i>); the INAD and TRP levels are not affected compared to the wild-type. …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    The <i>P[syt<sup>P-L</sup>]</i> mutation decreases the Ca<sup>2+</sup> affinity of release and vesicular release probability, but the readily releasable pool is unchanged. by Mallory C. Shields (4474210)

    Published 2017
    “…Left, representative traces of responses stimulated with a 20 ms interpulse interval. Scale bar 5 mV, 40 ms. Right, in <i>P[syt<sup>P-L</sup>]</i> heterozygotes, the paired pulse ratio is significantly increased (<i>+/-;P[syt<sup>WT</sup>]/+</i> = 1.02 ± 0.02, <i>+/-;P[syt<sup>P-L</sup>]/+</i> = 1.27 ± 0.06, *p = 0.0008, student t-test). …”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20